--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had to read this many times to understand it: > > the first time, I understood it intuitively, perhaps the *sound* and construction of it was balanced. > > the second time I tried to interpret it in terms of some imagined > nebulous 'higher state of consciousness'/hidden meaning, and it made no sense to me. > > the third time, I read it as a simple person, potentially in > need: 'we keep to ourselves unless we have a need to interact with > someone else. When we interact with someone else to fulfill our > need, we will experience them just to the degree that we must, in > order to fulfill our need.' > > the fourth time, I read what was written in terms of unobstructed > flow of pure consciousness, eliminating the imaginary boundaries > between the Ocean and the waves, between I and them. > > I conclude by enjoying the simplicity of it all, wondering why I > have once again used a bulldozer to remove a toothpick, and delight > in the absurdity of it all! > > Thank you!
LOL Thanks, Jim. I was wondering why that point-self gobbledygook came out the way it did. You really made a very nice cake out of my pile of pig-dung! Always nice to be appreciated from every angle! Yours always, :-) :-) :-D To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
