bob_brigante wrote:-
> NYT's tech guy has a simple guide to TV:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/66dqea
A little wrong on the 1080p stuff.  You can't make an LCD panel that is 
interlaced so all the 1080 line panels are progressive.   So there is no 
money anymore to be saved.  I don't even think you can find a DLP 
anymore that is displaying 1080i (if they ever could).  There is no 
broadcast standard for it but even some inexpensive upscaling DVD 
players support it.   How good the frame assembly is when converting 
from interlaced to progressive is another matter.  It that is too cheap 
you get "mouse teeth" on frames during a pan.  You see this effect 
sometimes on YouTube videos which are from HD footage.  You actually 
have to have logic that figures out what is the best way to de-interlace 
the 1080i frame as there are several techniques and you want to use 
different ones for different circumstances.

The reason some of the lower priced bans can be as good as name brands 
is because they didn't have to pay to design the set.  They basically 
are assembling a kit and putting their label on it.  Vizio just caved 
into MPEG-LA as they weren't paying royalties on patents which will 
drive their price up a little.  They actually assemble their sets in the US.




Reply via email to