--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "guyfawkes91" guyfawkes91@ > wrote: > > > > It's true the CIA infiltrated the movement. They wouldn't have been > > doing their job properly if they didn't infiltrate an organization > > that had declared itself to be a world government and was moving > > armies around the flash points of the world. > > > > But eventually they realized that we were harmless and so completely > > inept in our approach to the public that the very worst thing they > > could do was to step aside and let us ruin things without external > > assistance. Could the CIA ever do better than put Emanuel Schiffgens > > in front of a German audience and ask them to chant "Invincible > > Germany"? Crowning kings and queens and working hard to alienate > > pretty much everyone who has any contact with the TMO is beyond the > > capabilities of the CIA. They just don't have the imagination to dream > > up such barmy ideas. > > > > The instances mentioned have been discussed in previous threads and > > discounted. The fire in Manila was one of these "accidents" that > > frequently happen there. You might have noticed the number of hotels > > around town with blackened brickwork. Maybe the hotel didn't pay their > > protection money on time or needed an insurance claim. The out of town > > resort we were using went up in flames a few years after we'd left. > > Was that the CIA getting their dates wrong? > > > > Being a CIA agent in the TMO must have been one of the cushiest jobs > > imaginable. What could they tell their controllers? "I've just > > persuaded Maharishi that raising the course fees to an impractical > > level is a good idea. He swallowed it hook, line and sinker. This will > > certainly prevent people learning. Please send more money, I've been > > told I have to wear a large diamond on the third finger of my left > > hand and I have to keep up appearances" > > > > Nothing the CIA ever could or did do was a match for the damage we did > > to ourselves. > > > No doubt. If Maharishi couldn't handle the heat it doesn't say much > for his 'invincibility' bullshit.>>
Er...dude. Haven't you noticed? He's dead. OffWorld
