Or, paraphrasing Mainstream similarly; Let's see ..... if people help to keep them free, what responsibility do they have to future victims should they continue to defraud ? <
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Not defending them, just nit-picking for accuracy. > > > > Lawson > > > > > yeah, it would still be interesting to know what in the world they > were thinking as they were doing it. It wasn't pocket change those guys > were moving around while Earl was up at the front door > soliciting people in for the million dollar Enlightenment course & > not looking behind. > > Like, what kind of conscience do these people have? > These are people > one would want to work with? > > JGD, > -Doug in FF > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" > <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > > > > > Not a cult? That is good. What were the guys thinking when they > > > went in and pulled the levers to take the Kaplan money and > shuttle it > > > around? That what Maharishi and they were doing was more > important > > > than anything else? Like theft? Jai Guru Dev? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If it was out and out theft, he could and should have taken them to > court over it. > > > > MY understanding was that he verbally told them that certain > donations were > > earmarked for specific projects and they transferred the funds > somewhere > > else. Had he put it in writing, he cold have taken them to court > and likely won. > > > > Not defending them, just nit-picking for accuracy. > > > > Lawson > > > om
