Offworld, I don't have a problem with what Maharishi said about selection of mantras, I merely put the recording up because I thought it would interest FFL'ers and because it also illustrated the link between TM and religion, which for me is not a problem. That was the issue, that the TM movement is still trying to convince itself of the lack of such a connection. For me that is a bit like saying that water is not wet.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <no_re...@...> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> , nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> , "Paul Mason" <premanandpaul@> > > wrote: > > > > Of all the lowly creatures that post on FFL Paul Mason is the perhaps > > the lowliest, utterly devoted as he is to make a cheap little dollar. > > Mr. paul Mason, and Mr Nablusoss. > What did Maharishi say wrong in this explanation? > Honestly, I actually do not see what is wrong with any of it. Can > someone explain this to me? The quoted statement makes perfect sense. > Nature is very natural, mantras are good, but the MOST important thing > is the 'correct angle' ....and let go...as Maharishi used to say. The > 'correct angle' did not mean the 'perfect mantra', it only meant the > 'path of least resistance', and that is in the technique, not the sound > given, but the system for applying it. > > I honestly don't see why Paul Mason or Nablussos has a problem with what > was quoted of Maharishi by Paul Mason here? > > Please explain. > > OffWorld >
