I think that the recent discussions about religion
and the reaction to me proposing a test of Jyotish
have shed important light on the *real* legacy of
Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. I think that we can see
more evidence of his real legacy in the actions of
a few True Believer followers yesterday than we can
in any of his speeches or proclamations.

In short, the trend I see that he actively cultivated
most in his followers, and that several of his followers
*demonstrated* yesterday, is:

Treat any critics of TM harshly -- demonize
them and do anything you possibly can to make
others think that they have no credibility.
You incur no bad karma for this, and in fact
are fighting the good fight. It is not only
acceptable to demonize these critics, it is
your holy duty.

This is truly scary in my opinion. At the end of 2008,
I look back on an "internet history" of watching TM TBs
*consistently* attempt to demonize anyone who criticizes
TM, the TMO, and Maharishi. In one case, the *same*
person has been doing this for 15 years now, first on
alt.meditation.transcendental, and now for the last
four years on Fairfield Life.

It's grown to be such a "modus operandi" of this loud-
mouthed spiritual hit woman that it's actually *spread*,
and others have picked up the behavior from her, and
think that it is acceptable or even laudable behavior.
In the last four years Fairfield Life has degenerated
to the point that we actually see what happened yester-
day as "normal," and don't think twice about it.

I'm going to spend a moment thinking twice about it.

All I did yesterday was propose a test of something that
Maharishi believed in and sold for a high price to his
TB followers -- Jyotish.

The *immediate* reaction, coming *first* from the person
who has been systematically attempting to demonize critics
of TM for fifteen years, was to cast doubt on the test
because I was a "liar" and my word couldn't be trusted.

This "cue" was then picked up on by several others, who
jumped on the "Quick! Gotta demonize the TM critic" band-
wagon by screaming "Liar!" in unison with Judy. You know
who you are -- Raunchydog, EB11, and Nabby.

Then, when I took the possibility of "lying" out of the
equation by creating impartial judges to the Jyotish Test,
and giving them the answer to the challenge ahead of time,
the TM TBs had to shift their strategy. Calling me a liar
wasn't enough. So they shifted to more active demonization,
and tried to suggest that in addition to being a "liar,"
I was actually doing a Bad Thing by proposing this test.

Judy did her best to imply that I was "violating the
privacy" of my friend by making the person's medical
condition public. She kept harping on this over and over
and over, as if she thought she'd found a true "gotcha"
and had to make sure that everyone saw it. The ludicrous-
ness of this will become apparent when I post the actual
answer to the test.

Raunchydog jumped onto the bandwagon and Googled up some
irrelevant garbage to support Judy's claim of "privacy
violation." Typical...not only that she'd "pile on," but
that she wouldn't have the ability to say anything orig-
inal. Again, wait to see how red their faces are over
this "privacy violation" issue are when I post the
answer to the test.

Then EB11 piled on, *not* because she gives a shit about
Jyotish, but because she has been pretending to be a TMer
and felt she had to side with the TBs' "Gotta demonize
the TM critic. Just gotta" parade.

And finally Nabby jumped into the fray. Realizing that
calling me a liar wasn't stopping the proposed test of
one of Maharishi's cherished "vedic sciences," and that
Judy's attempt to make me a Bad Guy wasn't working, he
had to "up the ante." So he made up some stuff that he
*knew* I could prove wasn't true, and started demonizing
me with the *worst thing he could possibly think of*.

He claimed I had been thrown out of the TM movement, and
kept away from Maharishi. *Besides* the fact that this
is not true, isn't it interesting that that's the worst
thing that Nabby could think of to say about someone?
Doesn't that just *shout* religious fanatic?

JohnR's part in all of this has been benign. He may or
may not actually present his analysis of my friend's
chart. I hope he does, because that would illustrate
that at least *his* heart is in the right place.

But Judy? And Raunchydog? And Nabby? And *their* part
in this little drama? Actively trying to demonize me
in any way they could think of for the "crime" of
proposing this little test of something that Maharishi
claimed was a "science?"

That was pretty nauseating. They came out of this little
drama looking a lot worse than John did.

John will *at worst* come off as lacking cojones, if he
fails to present his analysis of the chart. Or he could
present one and it could be wrong. He *could* present an
analysis and have it be right. Another Jyotishi before
him actually "saw" this medical condition in my friend's
chart long before it appeared; John might, too.

If he fails to take up the challenge, he gets to live
with the knowledge that he's a coward and the suspicions
of others that he's a charlatan and knows it. If he posts
something that turns out to be wrong, he gets to live with
the realization that maybe Jyotish isn't as accurate as
he thought it was. And if he posts something and gets it
right, he "scores points" for the Jyotish team, big-time.

But Judy, Raunchydog, and Nabby? They "score points"
only for upholding Maharishi's "real legacy" -- demonize
the critic at any cost, and using any method you can
think of.

They have demonstrated how far 30-year TMers are willing
to go to demonize someone who dares to challenge some-
thing that Maharishi believed in.

THAT is Maharishi's real legacy to the world. Not his
teachings, but the willingness he has actively cultivated
in his followers to *try to do harm* to anyone who dares
to challenge those teachings.

That is cult behavior, and needs to be exposed for what
it is.

Remember what these TBs did yesterday over the coming
year. You'll be seeing them do it over and over and over
next year as well.

If you don't think it's a legacy worthy of a spiritual
tradition or a spiritual tradition that you admire, SAY
SO. Don't just sit back and let them do it. Then you
become complicit.



Reply via email to