It sounds as if you are describing the Natural State--which is a form of meditation but it is also a non-meditation. There is a path for this form of meditation. I describe it as "meditation isn't, getting used to is". But yes it is a path, has a view and has a result...that is of course if you are both talking about non-dual meditation...
On Jun 27, 2005, at 12:56 PM, Rory Goff wrote: > > I am not saying this didn't feel like a path at the time -- only > that after the fact, one sees it that led exactly nowhere. Hence I > don't really get the whole discussion of which path is better (or > gets us "enlightened" or "leads us to Buddhahood" or whatever), or > which view is better, and so on. To me they all look like exactly > the same path and the same view -- a view involving denial of here- > now in favor of something conceptualized and projected not-here-now; > e.g. something "better," "later." Am I missing something here? If > so, I appreciate your patience in attempting to explain it to me. It > must be a pretty huge blindspot, because I am definitely not getting > it. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
