--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" <steve.sun...@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] > > On Behalf Of Joe Smith > > Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 1:57 AM > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ??? > > > > > > > > > Are you saying this with any evidence or authority "Joe", or is this > > just > > > the way you wish it were? > > > > > > > Just being a jerk Rick, but it has been a year now. Personally, I > > don't think the book will ever be published. > > > > You may be right. I wonder how many of us would write a book if we > were in > > her position? > > Glory be to back pedaling.! Why not just say, "I guess she may not be > writing a book, which would then seem pretty much discredit her account, > since she evidently was on record that she was going to write a book. " > Right? Or maybe the report that she was going to write a book was a > second hand account and should therefore be discredited, but not her > second hand account of her sexual relationship with M. Or maybe her > first person account in the newspaper should be taken as sound in spite > of the disclaimer that she was encouraged by her new Guru to try to > discredit M. If this comes across as the ranting of a TBer, then I say > to you, I have heard a lot of screaming by people here who claim they > were smeared by innuendo, and weak accusations. So try to uphold a > consistent standard of evidence, I say.
Yep. Well said. > I sent an email off to Conny Larson asking if he knows what > > her intentions are. She's over in Sweden, where he lives, and they're > in > > touch. I'll post his response. Of course, Judith wasn't the only one, > but > > she was the only one rumored to have written a book. > > >
