Just to clarify for the overly serious, I am NOT suggesting that Shaas/amritasyaputra is a shill for the Shrivastava/Varma clan. I just woke up in a silly mood and felt like speculating on how funny it would be if we really had one here.
Similarly, I am NOT suggesting that enlightened_ dawn11 is in any way related to the illustrious saint from the Himalayas known as Sri Enlightened Schmitened Bo-Bightened Banana Fanna Fo-Fightened Fee Fi Mo-Mightened Enlightenedananda. Again, I was just being silly. Mea culpa. And finally, and to forestall charges of practicing medicine without a license, I was NOT suggesting that attaching rubies to one's testicles as piercings was a cure for impotence. No such extreme measures are necessary; that was just me being silly again. Everyone knows that rubies work just as well to cure impotence if worn on a cock ring. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "amritasyaputra" > <amritasyaputra@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "geezerfreak" <geezerfreak@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Follow the money, Billy. See if the mantra can take the bad > > > > taste out of your mouth after you do. See how much of your > > > > objectivity you have left after that. > > > > > > Indeed. Follow the money......right back to the many bank > > > accounts of the Shrivastava/Varma clan. > > Given Shaas' spiel, Geez, it sounds to me as > if FFL might have its first Shrivastava/Varma > shill. :-) > > Wouldn't that be a trip? Girish posting here > anonymously, trying to recover a few of the > "lost" to keep his bank accounts growing? > I'm not saying that that's what's going on > really, but *effectively* that's what's > going on. But it's "all good" because it > adds to the entertainment quotient for FFL. > Where else in the universe, for example, > could you hear someone say with a straight > face: > > "Sorry, Ben, but if a puja.net website or any other > site calls Vedic Devatas "Mythology" (as in "Vedic > Mythology Podcast") they disqualify themselves from > being taken seriously." > > Now THAT you can take seriously. Serious > something, anyway. :-) >
