--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG." <wg...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:43 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@>
wrote:
> > >>
> > >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008
<no_reply@>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG." <wgm4u@>
wrote:
> > >>>> perhaps after
> > >>>> all MMY was just human, true it would have been nice had he
> > >>>> said so!!
> > >>>
> > >>> He did.
> > >>>
> > >>> MMY: "I'm just a normal human being"
> > >>> Bevan: "Well today we certainly got a new definition of a
normal
> > >>> human being"
> > >>>
> > >>> - Vlodrop, 1999
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> MMY's normal was someone in CC....
> > >
> > >
> > > A pity he never thought that any of his students
> > > were normal. At least not enough to say so.
> > >
> > > Doncha think?
> >
> >
> > If I get what Amma implies, any of the gurus known for their
bad
> > behavior, i.e. sex with their students, diddling young boys,
etc.
> > could not or would not be jivan-mukta's, i.e. in CC. So by that
> > standard, ole M. was just one of many false gurus, many who
were
> > quite popular, but none were "normal" in the sense being
described.
>
> True, but the evidence is so sketchy it hardly holds up, a few
> accusations here and there over a 50+ year period is pretty much
par
> for the course these days. If he was a sexual predator surely there
> would have been many victims, yet it's hard to prove even one!
>
you must have figured out by now BillyG that Vaj has -anything- but
reality in mind when evaluating the "demon" Maharishi- lol. Vaj
projects all of his failures and unhappiness on the guy.
