--- In [email protected], Peter Sutphen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <attributions accidentally deleted> > --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > You could say Brahman encompasses *all* POVs, I > > > > guess. But not only would that flummox your > > > > point, you would get into the Four Negations, in > > > > which Brahman cannot be said either (1) to have a > > > > POV or (2) no POV, nor (3) all POVs, nor (4) > > > > neither a POV nor no POV. (With apologies to > > > > Nagarjuna.) > > > > > > Actually, this is not a bad "description" of > > Brahman. Thanks :-) > > > > Shorter version: Neti, neti. > > ( ). > > (). > > (.) > > .() > > ). > > (. > > .) > > .( > > ) > > ( > > . > > (sound of mind popping here).......
Brahman is not the sound of mind popping. Brahman is not the sound of mind not popping. Brahman is not the sound of mind popping and the sound of mind not popping. Brahman is not neither the sound of mind popping nor the sound of mind not popping. Play again? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
