Edg
Appreciate the comments. Most of the stuff I write is 'old', usually an hour
or so before
you get it.
As most may, I have multiple reasons for 'posting' both here and anywhere.
Always I look at reaction/response or, none as it often adds to things I write.
Yesterday
is an example - I was emailing back and forth with a woman on a Muslim sight who
spent lots of time judging with no basis for it (in fact, she incited todays
'Pinnocchio'
one), and yesterday, her reactions 'popped out' one on my views on religion
called,
Religions Are Dead, which oddly was published yesterday on Rense.com - so
it's always an unknown what will come up.
Maybe I'll write something on 'fresh'!
Cheers,
Arhata
Oh, and I'm not a fan of most who follow ANY guru/master/whatever (incliuding
Osho) without them standing 'alone'.
Arhata,
You do sometimes submit "fresh words," but so much of what you post seems
dated. Reason: sue me, but the fact that you cut and paste and do not correct
the errors due to translating your text's formatting into "Yahoo speak" screams
to me that you're troll-posting your previous writings with no reason other
than to be in the spotlight.
Also, you always have that damned date in your signature so my knee jerk is to
assume the post came from that era -- again, sue me, but it's a turn off.
Why don't you just post all your stuff to the files section and be done with it?
Meanwhile, when you do respond and interact, I find you interesting -- not
often on a topic that grabs me -- but interesting. You've got a tee shirt from
paying some dues -- probably from being abused by Osho's group morals, so
there's some wisdom to be tapped inside ya, but most of the time you come off
as someone shouting from the back of the crowd just to hear his own voice -- a
sin I have committed often enough that I'm an expert on this, so heed my advice
-- if you engage us with fresh stuff, we'll be able to read you "in context"
and that will be true intimacy.
Edg
