--- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunsh...@...> wrote:
>
> On Mar 24, 2009, at 12:38 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
[cardemaister wrote:]
> >>> "..it seems to me that many
> >>> people enjoy their TM -- while a significant minority
> >>> have problems such as depression, anxiety, dissociation,
> >>> involuntary tics, etc."
> >>
> >> Every once in a while John's mask slips, and what's
> >> behind his lip service to TM--such as that in your
> >> quote--gets inadvertently spat out in all its ugliness.
> >
> > What phrase do you object to?  If your job is helping
> > people who do have problems like the late Margret Singer
> > then the reality of such a population is just a fact.
> 
> I was wondering the same thing--seems to me
> John's quote is right on, realistic.  God only
> knows what "mask" Judy is really afraid of.

Idiot Sal does it again, with assistance from Curtis's
failure to include proper attributions.

The quote at the top was from *cardemaister*, not
me. He was responding to my earlier post (which, of
course, poor delicate Sal couldn't bring herself to
read, even though Curtis had quoted it in full at
the end of the post).

The "lip service" I was referring to, the "mask," 
rather obviously, is what cardemaister quoted, the
mealy-mouthed acknowledgment that "many people enjoy
their TM" (followed by a carefully disguised plug
for his services for those who don't).

When that mask *slips*, what comes out is what *I* had
quoted to start with, John's ugly comment about the
plans to do research on the children in Lynch's project:

"I'd sure be more comfortable if researchers would
stick to experimenting on monkeys and leave the kids
alone."

One would think folks with a few brain cells to rub
together would have learned that when a post doesn't
seem to make sense, it often helps to backtrack in
the thread to find the original context. In this case
Sal wouldn't even have had to go back; she could have
read the original post included beneath Curtis's
question to me.


Reply via email to