--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > But there's *no way* people can ever have the > > > > > complete picture without really getting into it, > > > > > including plenty of experience of the technique. > > > > > > > > > > In between virtually no information about TM's > > > > > origins and context and full information, there's > > > > > a big swath of *partial* information that is > > > > > essentially misleading. If one thinks practice > > > > > of the TM technique is highly beneficial for > > > > > most people, and conveying full information > > > > > isn't a practical option, what does one do? > > > > > > > > I think you are confusing the ability to present a > > > > more complete picture of the TM practice with the > > > > ability to control how people view and react to > > > > this information. > > > > > > Bingo!!! > > > > > > That's exactly it. As far as I can tell, > > > Judy is convinced that there is a "proper" > > > or "authoritative" or "correct" "complete > > > picture of TM practice." > > > > > > Coincidentally enough, it happens to be > > > her view. > > > > In stark contrast to the way you feel about > > *your* view (both of you), right? > > This is the thing that Judy has NEVER > understood about me. Or, as I interpret > his posts here, about Curtis. > > We really DON'T feel that our view is > the "correct" view, or "the truth." It > is nothing more than "our view."
So you'd both acknowledge, then, that my view might be right?
