--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > <snip> > > Seems to me that MMY's "unique contribution" is the > > understanding that thinking a mantra is no different > > than thinking any other thought. > > I'm not sure you can pick out any one specific point > as his unique contribution. It was the way he put > the various aspects together, in the instructional > formula, in the checking formula and algorithm, and > in the three days of checking, in the way teachers > expanded on these points in response to questions. > (I'm speaking strictly about the *method*, not any > SCI stuff.) > > Ultimately, just as "TM is not a technique," as MMY > said, you can't really be instructed in "how to do" > TM. You can only be guided away from what is *not* TM, > until you fall into what it *is*. >
And only maybe. ;-) L
