Normal 0 Too imprecise. Give us something substantive to
consider.
What do you mean by non-dual samadhi. Whose non-dual samadhi? Gaudapada in
the Mandukya Karikas? Shankara in his Bhagavad Gita commentary? Abhinavagupta?
Longchenpa? AbnAl-Arabi? St. Symeon the New Theologian, St. Gregory Palamas?
Radharani in Goloka Vrindavana?
What is non-dual compassion? How can compassion be non-dual since it involves
an other? In Buddhism the Brahma-Vihara meditations are not considered
adequate to generate liberation either in Theravada or Mahayana but they can
generate a full dhyana-samapatti. Is this what you mean or are you discussing
something else. If so what is it?
Who are these advanced Patanjali meditators? Where and when were their
neurological signatures studied? What studies of non-dual meditators
demonstrate significant parallels with Patanjali meditators. What studies are
you talking about? Where can we find these studies?
Why should anyone believe that neurological brainwave activity is a
definitive indicator of anything spiritual? This sounds like TM speak.
This is a question that has never been answered by anyone, most especially by
neurologists. It all appears to be sets of inferences linked to a-prior
assumptions. This is especially true of the TMO.
Why parrot it if you hate it?
Vaj:
One of the fastest ways, if not the
fastest way to generate nondual
samadhi is to learn the practice of
nondual compassion meditation. It
actually generates the same neurological
signatures as advanced Patanjali
meditators in samadhi.
