Nab, It's not your job to have to answer my questions, but you made a statement here, and if you don't cough up the proof, then it is your reputation, such as it is here, that suffers -- not me.
Get it? I'm calling you a bullshitter, but that doesn't matter or should it to you, but your reputation which is the foundation of what others will think of your posts about Creme etc. IS something about which you might want to have a sense of integrity. If you can't pony up a link to an astronomer, then you misrepresented your guru, and that has to be a sin even in your eyes, right? Edg --- In [email protected], Duveyoung <no_re...@...> wrote: > > Still hoping you'll give me a link to ANY astronomer who says he's seen the > star and is willing to account for himself to his fellow professional > astronomers. > > Without you making your statement real in this regard, why would anyone > consider this star anything but one of millions of UFO sightings that are > usually explainable in many other ways instead of "it's a new star." > > You may believe that a light in the sky is a star, but astronomers have to > have their instruments tell them that -- not Creme or his TB followers. > > And a star is a star is a star -- it doesn't turn on and off, it has to > always be there, or it has never been there, and instead, some other > phenomenon is being experienced. > > Every now and then I try to hold someone's feet to the fire -- I guess I'm > like Judy -- but, geeze, Nab, either you get real or once again I see you as > impossible to expect truthful statements. > > Edg > > --- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > http://www.share-international.org/media/news_releases.htm > > <http://www.share-international.org/media/news_releases.htm> > > >
