--- In [email protected], "Nelson" <nelsonriddle2...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], off_world_beings <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > --- In [email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]> , "raunchydog" <raunchydog@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Just as Bush tried to squash free speech by rounding up protesters the
> > Republican National Convention in New York in 2004, the hyper vigilance
> > of the DHS will be the undoing of what little we have left of the bill
> > of rights. Get this straight. Most people who go to a protest, whether
> > on the left of right of the political spectrum are law abiding citizens
> > who do not mean the president harm.>
> > 
> > Er, they are not talking about protesters dummy.
> > 
> > They are talking about right-wing armed militia who intend to operate
> > outside the bounds of the law.
> > 
> > OffWorld
> >
>   Wasn't that a similar case in the late seventeen hundreds?
>

Yes, if you are referring to the Continental Army, which "...had no money, and 
few soldiers. The Continental Congress raised eight companies of soldiers, each 
numbering 120 men. These companies were made up entirely of cripples, invalids, 
blind men, and men missing arms and legs. But, they were fighting on there own 
land, for their own land, and for freedom. And, they had a great leader. They 
got supplies by stealing them from the British. (Fort Ticonderoga)

George Washington lamented that the Continental Army had 'very little 
discipline, order or government' at the beginning of the Revolutionary War. As 
the war progressed, his soldiers learned European military drill, and combined 
it with their determination and frontier know-how to defeat the redcoats, one 
of the world's best-trained and best-equipped armies."

Is the DHS preparing to squash a Revolutionary War? It sure as hell sounds like 
it. IMO the power of the DHS is more frightening and a greater danger to our 
freedom than any threat an extremist group could pose to the president. My God, 
if any president was ever in danger of getting whacked, it is likely it would 
have been Bush than the popular president we now have, Obama. Bush is still 
standing and Obama will as well, and without the machinations and propaganda of 
the DHS scaring the shit out of us, causing us to be paranoid and mistrust our 
fellow citizens. Divide and conquer. It's an old trick, doncha know. 

Reply via email to