For the record, this rant has nothing to do with Shemp, merely with the person who once cried "Death threat!" on FFL (and who still does) trying to suggest that people should "know" when another poster is kidding.
And that provided me an opportunity to post one of the tidbits my attorney found from another of our august FFL members. Neither has anything to do with Shemp. As far as I know, Shemp has never run an Internet porn site for the Gambino crime family. :-) --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> wrote: > > > > > > If my attempt at humour with John Manning backfired > > > because he is void of any sense of humour, I am truly > > > sorry for hurting his feelings. > > > > > > But if the rather lame and silly things I said about > > > him are the standard upon which to label one as "insane" > > > and "meanspirited" then gosh, Barry, what does that make > > > you in light of all the horrible things you write ON A > > > DAILY FUCKING BASIS about Judy (to take just one of the > > > targets of your hate)? > > > > I was thinking the same thing. You expected everyone to > > realize you were kidding; Barry intends for his lies to > > be believed. > > > > Which is why, incidentally, he didn't realize you were > > kidding. > > This from the person who characterized my > suggestion that she was going to get so angry > that she would spontaneously burst into flame > a "death threat." > > And who claims this to this day. > > As someone would say, <guffaw> > > :-) > > Tom "Indeed my TM/TMSP practice is becoming > sweeter and sweeter." Pall has *acted out* > on his revenge fantasies several times in the > past. In a post last night, he still says that > he's *proud* of having posted porn on FFL in > an attempt to get it taken down and still hopes > that that happens. He has claimed here falsely > that I sent him "kiddie porn" in email; that > is a claim that in America sics Internet cops > whose job it is to scan the Net for such perps > on your ass. Check out the quote lower in this > post if you want to *really* guffaw at the > irony of this claim coming from Tom Pall. This > is an example of the things my attorney now > has in a file in case Tom ever feels like > "acting out" again. > > Me, I've just suggested that in my opinion > the "view of self" that a few folks here have > of themselves is not the *only* view, and that > the "Big Picture" description of them might just > include a little more psychosis and a lot less > importance in the grand scheme of things. > > Tom Pall writes on alt.tv.pol-incorrect: > > > I spent 4 hears with multiple on-line companies, notably > > a company called Lexitans, in Leawood, KS, USA (It has > > since changed names to Cyber Data Processing, though the > > 900 number company retains its name Overland Data Systems). > > We took no pictures. We provided bandwidth (multiple DS3s), > > picture and chat. Soem of the sites where > > http://www.twogirlsex.com www.coedsex.com, www.playgirl.come > > (which is NOT for women). > > > > The growth of income looked like we're reach 10 US Billion > > in just a few years. The Federal Trade Commission plus the > > Credit Card Companies cause most of the $US millions a day > > to be charged back. > > > > We received numerous unsolicited letters from women and men, > > hoping to strike it big in porn. They included resumes, > > references and, yes, pictures. > > > > There a million guys and girls, straight and gay, with > > terrific builds, all hoping to just be something to be a > > hamburger flipper or an office girl/buy. And it's no longer > > a "bad" thing. When I mentioned that I filed on my income > > tax, occupation "pornographer", most people wanted to know > > where they sign up. > > > > I was an Oracle DBA. It was a work a day work. Yes, I had > > access to all dirty picures. But I've referred CNN.COM. > > > > White collar crime pays. Always has, always will - the > > repercussions just AREN'T that severe. And I'll bet if you > > ask ANY of these guys if they had the chance to do it again, > > even with all the penalties and prison time, they'd say > > "Yes" w/o giving it a second thought. > > There you have it -- "TM ethics" in a nutshell. > > Compare and contrast to, just a few days ago, Tom's > response to a good-natured post about "ample breasts" > by scienceofabundance: > > > Mein Got! Weren't any of the guys of FFL besides me breast > > fed as infants? I swear I've never heard any talk like > > this about women's breasts in any guy's locker rooms. > > To quote the same person I quoted above, > because we all know *she* won't say it about > a fellow TM apologist: > > "It's the hypocrisy, stupid." > > No one has to react to I Am The Eternal / Tom > Pall by "calling him names." All that is neces- > sary is to repost his own words. >
