Am I the only one who finds it odd that we think the right to privacy to be 
sacrosanct, but the right "to not be gratuitously attacked with character 
assassinations" eh, not so much.

If Maharishi ever put his finger on a concept that had practicality, it was 
"take care of the tender feeling level."  I doubt anyone here has the 
rationalization potency to argue against this proviso; surely all here see it 
at least as "generally good advice."

When I first barged in here with guns blazing, I pretty much showed how little 
I cared about the TFL concept; my only defense being that I had been reading 
FFL as a lurker, so when I finally did post, I had already been accustomed to 
the stomp-romp here.  My bad.  Not that I could pull of being a saint who spoke 
only 1. sweet, 2. necessary 3. truth, but I do love this three-rule filter as a 
way for determining if the golden rule is honored.

If, magically, the FFL posters did honor the TFL, who would need privacy rights?

On the TV show Kung Fu, our hero steps -- barefooted -- into a pit filled with 
rattlesnakes.  Each snake had the attitude and venom of ________ (fill in the 
blank with the name of any FFLer who is known to personally attack others.) 
Kwai Chang Caine walks the length of the pit, and while doing so, he remembers 
his blind master telling him: "If you see yourself in others, others will see 
themselves in you, and who harms himself?"

He doesn't get bit.

Has anyone here NOT been bit on their jaunts in this pit?  Even Marek gets 
blasted herein.

What would it take to stop, say, Judy, from uncoiling with deadly intent to 
shut down someone's mind with an injection of her privately concocted poison 
meant to kill someone's esteem?  What would harmlessness look like to her such 
that she'd relax?  Here's the hard part: she, like all of us, would know it if 
she saw it, and she'd calm down.  Judy as a "Saint Meter" -- gotta love the 
idea, eh?

Of course, my using her, as an example "of someone who is known to ignore the 
TFL," violates the TFL's rules, but, I'm just sayin'!

To me, knowing that every post of mine will be subject to a scalding retort of 
some sort, makes it impossible to show my heart here any more than I've 
attempted.  Share a photo of a beloved child in my arms here?  Yeah right.  
Share a love poem?  Confess a foible? Big fucking risks to take here when it's 
all too easy to see an array of fangs poised in hissing mouths agap.

Hell, even admitting here at FFL that I watched American Idol was a bigass 
decision for me, because watching it is one of those guilty pleasures that I 
indulge in despite there being no reasonable explanation for why it "does me 
likes I wants me to be done."  History's host of truly talented 
singer-composers can easily put almost any American Idol singer to shame, but I 
go to that small pond nonetheless to watch what "less than world class" singers 
can do. Go figure.

Who here will champion the TFL?  Not Rick, that's for sure.  He thinks it 
tickles when Nab posts yet another storm of stings, so what's the TFL to Rick 
if I call Turq an odious clod? (Two of the TFL's rules broken....1. not sweet, 
2. not necessary to say what everyone already knows.)  Rick will not censor me. 

Nor, get this, will Turq show it if somehow the words that I post get past his 
defenses and he feels the sting, so I cannot hope that Turq will weep for shame 
in public here and truly instruct me by showing what I've wrought.  Others here 
will chime in if they want to pile on Turq, or they'll pile on me to defend 
him, but who brings up the TFL as the first concept to consider when dissonance 
is apparent?

What FFL really really needs is a Rodney King.  

We need someone to, you know, sin in some minor way like going ten miles over 
the speed limit, and then having some FFL cop pull him over and then seriously 
beat the shit out of him and gets a few other FFL cops to gather around who add 
a kick here, a tasering there.  Get it?  I want someone to be soundly fucked 
over by FFLers in some sort of Lord Of The Flies moment.

Maybe that'd do it. To have us standing around a prone body and see someone so 
thoroughly and truly hurt emotionally that their blood and bruises cannot be 
denied, and there are we, the mob of savages with badges, suddenly confronted 
with the fact that we've almost killed a person on the side of the road for 
almost nothing.

Rick, what would you do then?  Would "we're all just having fun at a party and 
we've got to put up with folks who like to throw their drinks into the faces of 
others" be your defense as our FFL Rodney lays there groaning?

Edg










 --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <r...@...> wrote:
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of ruthsimplicity
> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 8:03 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Respect people's right to anonymity
>  
> 
> What brought this issue up Rick? I haven't been around much lately. This is
> the issue that worries me about this forum. I have seen several people here
> bring up real names and given that I don't read everything, don't have a
> long history with you folks, I can't tell how they learned the names and
> whether they were being outed. 
> 
> 
>  
> Someone here has been posting under an alias. He used to post under his real
> name. Someone else figured out who he was and posted his name and street
> address. I feel that people should have the right to remain anonymous. Of
> course, before being outed the fellow who was outed had threatened physical
> violence against the guy who outed him, and I don't appreciate that either,
> but I don't take it too seriously, since they live on different continents.
> OffWorld often vents his Scottishness by threatening violence, and I don't
> take it seriously. Hard to know where to draw the line, but I'm just
> requesting that we all respect others' desire to remain anonymous.
>




------------------------------------

To subscribe, send a message to:
[email protected]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to