--- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradh...@...> wrote: > > > On May 4, 2009, at 4:07 PM, sparaig wrote: > > > Again: you can't use studies from 25 years ago to refute research > > done just 2-3 > > years ago unless you're willing to discuss the more recent > > research's findings > > explicitly and directly, which is something neither you nor the > > researchers > > you quote have actually done. > > > Again, the reasons for this have already been pointed out to you in > previous posts. Please consult the FFL archives. I'm afraid we have to > go with the good science in this case. These alpha coherence buzzings > are common to all relaxation response meditation forms. I have new > list of all these from the conference with HHDL this last weekend > which Herbert Benson spoke at (real nice guy!), I'll post it when I > get a chance. >
Again: when researchers don't comment directly on research published in the past 2-3 years, you gotta wonder what is up. Fact is, the TM findings don't fit their pet theories so they ignore the findings. Goes both ways, of course. L.
