--- In [email protected], "guyfawkes91" <guyfawke...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > Boy, if that book caused him "significant discomfort,"
> > > how in the world did he adjust to getting his weight
> > > in gold, dressing up like a Vedic Lord Fauntleroy, and
> > > having 25x his daily food intake wasted? (A crime
> > > against humanity and nature, IMO.)
> > 
> > Was that story about the food confirmed?
> >
> I think it's unlikely that someone from the Vlodrop 
> kitchens is going to post a message on FFL to confirm
> it.

Uh, no. But if that's what's being done because it's
supposedly authentically "Vedic" and a sign of Tony's
kingship, you wouldn't expect it to be a big secret
either, would you?

> But I have heard it from elsewhere via a friend in
> Germany. I think with stories like this we have to
> check if they seem reasonable according to what we
> know about they way things work in the TMO.

I suspect we could all make up stories that "seem
reasonable" in that regard. Did you know that King
Tony's finger- and toenail clippings are distributed
among the Vlodrop staff for veneration?

> We know that the elite of the TMO live in a protected
> world, have a strong sense of entitlement and they
> like to do things that emphasize their superiority
> and make sure the lower ranks know their place, e.g.
> Harris Kaplan's garden ornaments or the televised
> "family chats". So it's not outside the bounds of
> possibility that it might be true.

Lots of things aren't outside the bounds of possibility.

> Because the people at the bottom are treated like dirt
> they don't have much in the way of loyalty, so stories
> do leak out. Also it's so nutty you couldn't make it up.
> So sadly it does have a ring of truth to it.

As long as it's unconfirmed gossip, I don't think we
should be referring to it as if it were established
fact, that's all. I mean, we're not happy when the
TMO proclaims something to be scientific when it
isn't, right?



Reply via email to