--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> --- In [email protected], "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In [email protected], "Patrick Gillam" 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (snip)
> > 
> > > An aside: the non-judgmentalism of the witnesser may explain 
why 
> > purportedly 
> > > enlightened people can be assholes. They have no motivation to 
> > change because their 
> > > relative personalities, jerks though they may be, are fine to 
the 
> > non-judgmental Self.
> > 
> > 
> > Wow! Now that's a stretch. 
> > 
> > Here is another version of the two birds in a tree analogy:
> > 
> > 
> > "After recognizing the possibility of divine guidance and 
actually 
> > realizing its presence within ourselves, there naturally descends 
a 
> > profound spirit of awe and reverence.  God is so great and so 
good 
> > that He is personally concerned with little insignificant me, you 
> > and everyone else!  More than that, we are not separate from Him, 
> or 
> > He from us.  The Upanishads compare it to two birds on the same 
> > tree.  One bird represents the Supreme Lord and the other bird 
the 
> > individual spirit soul.   One bird is trying to enjoy the fruits 
of 
> > the tree, but the other bird, representing the Lord, is simply 
> > watching and waiting for His friend to turn his attention to 
Him.  
> > Unfortunately, living beings are very busy trying to enjoy the 
> > fruits of the material body – some sweet and some sour – but the 
> > Lord is simply the witness and waits for us to become fed up with 
> > the fruits of material life and turn our attention to Him."
> > 
> > I would say that the enlightened asshole is a busy bird who 
> although 
> > may have attained great insight has still not lost the taste for 
> > sour fruit. Why can't "enlightenment" be something that has many, 
> > many levels and degrees and just because someone has 
become "close" 
> > to God on some level it doesn't mean that they don't have a long 
> > way to go on others?
> 
> Bottom line is that no matter how much the bird enjoying
> the fruits "turns his attention" to the bird *representing*
> the Lord, it's still a condition of duality.  As long as
> there is still a "witness" witnessing, there is still duality.
> I suspect, as you say in your last paragraph, that this is
> merely an early stage of enlightenment, one that ripens over
> time into one in which there is no witness separate from
> activity because there is only one bird.  
> 
> Unc

No bird, no tree... Not even birdshit.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to