--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" <willytex@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > sparaig wrote:
> > > > Do you have reason to take the
> > > > word of one public servant over
> > > > another, given neither is under
> > > > oath?
> > > >
> > > Well, I can't imagine a professional
> > > public servant employee of the CIA
> > > lying to congressional leaders, in
> > > an Intelligence Committee briefing,
> > > but I can imagine a politician like
> > > Nancy Pelosi lying every single day
> > > in a press conference on TV.
> >
> > I can easily imagine a CIA representative shading the facts
> > presented to a member of Congress in a way commensurate
> > with White House policy.
>
> CIA has quite a well-established reputation by
> now for lying, or at least "shading the truth,"
> to Congress and even to the president.
>
Yes, this seems to be part of the job description...
There must be a few elitist groups, as part of the organization, that would
need to be kept secret because of their secret activities...
You never could get the whole truth from them...
Remember Ollie North, and the Iran/Contra hearings...
Seems Ollie is still on the scene, as though nothing had happened?
And the Reagan election of the 1980...
Reagan had inside communication with the Iranians, in that they were released
as part of an agreement, to get him elected...
And so it goes...
Only the raising of awareness and consciousness can produce a strong enough
mirror to expose the lies, and manipulations..
