--- In [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , Vaj <vajradh...@...> wrote: > > > On May 21, 2009, at 1:13 PM, off_world_beings wrote: > > > Vaj has no proof for anything he says. Which do you prefer, myth or > > science? > > > Hi Offworld: > > As you know, I'm a big fan of good quality meditation research, esp. >
Vaj, what you need to prove what you are saying is even at least a larger fraction of the numbers of robust research published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and from hundreds of independent sceintific institutions around the world - over several decades - that Maharishi's TM has. The rest of your post is dishonest. You are anti-science when it does not suit your anti-TM agenda. Period. No-one respects people who CHOOSE to be anti-science, just because it contradicts their unscientific obsession. You and Jerry Falwell are exactly the same in this regard. If you believe in science, please state the following as a reply to this post (I know you will ignore it): ""What the world needs now is to take up anything that has robust research published in peer-reviewed scientific journals in hundreds of independent journals and from hundreds of independent scientific institutions around the world - over several decades - otherwise why do we even have science?"" Please cut and paste this above and state it as your own if you belief in science. Others who believe in science on FFL should do the same to show that you are not an anti-science fundamentalist like Vaj and Turq. OffWorld .
