--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you had a belief system (such as Tantra) in which > nothing was inherently either good or evil, would you > need an "enemy" to reinforce that belief system or > lend it "credibility?" Possibly not. But the minute > you have a belief system that positions itself as > "good" or "holy," you have a need for there to be > something to be "bad" or "unholy" to provide contrast > to it. > > Interesting subject. I don't really have a clue here; > I'm just rappin', off the top of my head. > Unc One could argue from the POV of the *Absolute* that nothing was inherently good or evil. But, the last time I checked, we're currently stuck in the *Relative* and, as we're seeing on a daily basis, there's plenty of "evil" going on. Something needs to be done about it. Not to bolster some particular religion or *cause* but to save the freakin' planet. Jeff To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
