--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > OK, this is a classic example of the *intent* I > spoke of in a post last week, "Thou shalt not > suffer a TM critic to be thought well of." > > As I see it (and Vaj...I like you, guy, but I'm > going to be almost as critical of you in this > rap as I am of the "pile on" crew) the thread > started with Vaj saying something that pushed > EmptyBill's ego buttons and made him squeal > "Gotcha" inwardly. He leaped into the fray with > his normal *intent* and modus operandi, which > is "spiritual dick size contest." Another way > of stating this intent and standard operating > procedure is "Gotcha you s.o.b. Nyaaaah nyaaaah > I know more than you, and thus my spiritual > dick is longer than yours." >
In any dispute between emptybill and vaj, emptybill is far more credible. Vaj constantly digs up obscure texts to denigrate Maharishi and invalidate TMer's practice and he does so by pontificating, lying and distorting whatever he happens to dig up. It's valid to ask, how does he find the time and why is he so addicted to such odious behavior? Since few people who post here know much about the convoluted hodgepodge of information Vaj writes about, he can lie cart blanche without much challenge. I am glad to see someone like emptybill come forward with the ability to argue Vaj point for point. However the moment emptybill shines a bright light on Vaj's lies, Vaj scurries away like a roach, too much of a coward to admit his distortions or defend his lies. It's interesting that the only two people so many folks on this forum accuse of habitually lying happen be the two biggest dick wavers ever to post on FFLife. Barry and Vaj, what a pair. > To his discredit, Vaj often does the exact same > thing. Who the fuck CARES what you guys know > from what you have read about *other people's > spiritual experiences*? Every time you two get > into one of these armchair academic dick-size > contests, I consider BOTH of your dicks smaller. > > Then the "pile ons" started. And that's an > *intent* of a different color, in my opinion. > > Randy Meltzer contributed the only substance to > the "pile on" followups. He cited his own exper- > ience having been to Jyotir Math. I have no > problem with this, although in a followup it > appears that, like EmptyBill, Randy has an > ongoing grudge against Vaj based on some > interaction in the past. > > But the *rest* of the "pile-on" folks? They had > one and only one *intent* -- "Gotta demonize > the TM critic." Judy, as usual, contributed > nothing of substance. She can't. She is neither > intelligent enough nor experienced enough in > these topics *to* contribute substance. So she > did what she always does, and used it to play > "Gotcha" against Vaj. The idea being sold to > lurkers here is, "If EmptyBill 'caught' Vaj > in one mistake or 'lie,' then you should not > believe *anything* Vaj says." Then, having had > her TM critic demonization orgasm for the day, > she lights a cigarette and kicks back. :-) > > Nabby is even less intelligent, and has even > less experience in the spiritual marketplace, > so all he can contribute is a mis-understanding > of and misquoting of "All hat, no cattle." Again, > there is no attempt to contribute anything of > substance, only the *intent* to demonize a TM > critic. > > Next comes shukra69, contributing nothing more > than a dig at Buddhism. Again, the *intent* is > clear. Add no substance, just "pile on" to play > "demonize the TM critic." Share a cigarette > afterwards with Judy. :-) > > Then comes Shemp, making the only funny comment > in the whole thread. Well said, Shemp. I com- > pletely agree with you. Clean *intent* there. > > Then comes (sadly) Lurk. His point may be accurate, > that Vaj *does* bail from the endless dick-size > contests that EmptyBill trots out, but who wouldn't? > > Then comes Raunchydog, again with zero content, > only the compulsive *intent* of "piling on" to > a TM critic. > > Then comes Robert, doing the same thing. > > ARE YOU PEOPLE DERANGED? > > Yes, Vaj pisses people off. Yes, Vaj has a 'tude- > and-a-half about TM and its followers. But do you > think that YOUR "Gotta get him" 'tude is any > better or more "evolved?" > > The only thing sadder in my opinion than two > supposedly grown men confusing "truth" with the > stuff that they've read in books is believing that > the "truth" they prefer has anything to do with > the size of their dicks. It doesn't. Only the > size of their egos. > > And the only thing sadder than *that* is people > who act as "spectators" to the dick-size contest > and "pile on" when they perceive one of the > participants as losing. What does THAT say > about their state of consciousness, eh? >
