--- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradh...@...> wrote: <snip> > <sigh> Lawson, despite all the aspersions cast upon > me by you and Our Dear Editor, per FFL posting > guidelines, I just snip above what I think is > relevant for brevity's sake. There is no mysterious > intent behind my snips other than brevity.
No, sorry, that's simply not true. Vaj's quoting is among the most profligate of anybody's here; and he fails to indicate when he's left something out. When he snips, it isn't for the sake of "brevity." (Not to mention the weird formatting of quotes in his posts, which makes them--possibly intentionally-- very hard to read.)
