cardemaister wrote:
> --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
>> --- In [email protected], cardemaister <no_reply@> wrote:
>>
>>> --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's very simple. Take the birth data below and describe the
>>>> individual and what he (it was definitely a man) would have
>>>> been likely to be like in terms of personality. Describe what
>>>> you think his career possibilities might have been, his like-
>>>> lihood of finding love and a happy marriage, and his potential
>>>> impact on the times in which he lived.
>>>>
>>>> Birth Date: November 1st 1526
>>>> Time: 6.45pm
>>>> Place: Paris, France
>>>>
>>> On the basis of the Western Chart, studying it less than
>>> 5 minutes, I'm afraid: an extremely powerful individual,
>>> with supreme and "surprizing" skills in verbal communication?
>>> Also rather attractive? Perhaps a bit seriousminded, though?
>>>
>>> Gonna try to find out by googling, who he is...
>>>
>> Every one of your interpretations is accurate, Card.
>>
>> Thanks for playing.
>>
>
> The only one I could find was Catherine Jagellon(sp?). Obviously
> can't be her...
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_Jagellonica_of_Poland
Or the birth data was incorrect. Usually better for tests to use a
person whose birth data is well known. When you go back in history the
validity of birth time, date and location can be questionable. It is
better to stick with people who have an AA rating in the AstroDataBank.
But if you have someone who actually knows little or nothing about
astrology they will not know these things.
