the reduction in fee that the article is talking about is the for the David 
Lynch projects where the fee is a fraction of what it is otherwise. The fees 
for individual instruction are only slightly lowered.

$--- In [email protected], "Eustace" <emf...@...> wrote:
>
> Sorry for being dated, but I just came across this February Guardian article
> 
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/jan/27/david-lynch-meditation
> 
> where it says:
> 
> "Beloved of hippie celebrities everywhere since the 1960s, TM's expensive 
> teaching courses risked it being priced into oblivion until Lynch was 
> credited with persuading Maharishi Mahesh Yogi - to whom he became close in 
> 2003 after paying $1m to participate in the guru's four-week "Millionaire's 
> Enlightenment Course" - to radically reduce the TM learning fee so that more 
> younger people could learn the practice."
> 
> I was unaware that David Lynch had persuaded Maharishi to "radically reduce 
> the TM learning fee". Actually, I first heard of the fee sales last January - 
> to $1500 until September for now. Does anybody have more information about 
> this? When did it start? And what fees are agreed upon by the David Lynch 
> Foundation and the movement for the scholarship initiations of students?
> 
> I didn't know about David Lynch being in the Millionaire's Enlightenment 
> Course either. That explains a few things. So that's how Lynch managed to 
> represent the meditators at the top circles of the movement, where normally 
> you have to be a governor or more to participate. It's nice to know that 
> there is someone representing the meditators' point of view up there.
> 
> As for "TM's expensive teaching courses risked it being priced into oblivion" 
> it was clear. It is not surprising what John Hagelin in his recent email 
> writes:
> 
> "The number of adults learning the Transcendental Meditation® technique this 
> year has almost tripled â€" and this month more people learned than in any 
> month in the past 15 years!"
> 
> What *is* surprising is that he goes on to say that:
> 
> "The new TM.org website, the national media from our April Change Begins 
> Within Benefit Concert with Paul McCartney and friends, and our reduced 
> course fees have produced a sharp rise of interest."
> 
> The new TM.org website! What was wrong with the old one in the first place? 
> Whom is he trying to fool? I would bet that the new website played nil role 
> in the sharp rise of interest. And the Concert without the reduced fees would 
> have produced much less impressive results in initiation numbers.
> 
> emf
>


Reply via email to