--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcg...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In related news, scientists also found that most animal species > > > > > > > in the study regularly sniffed the anuses of their fellow > > > > > > > animals, ate their own shit, and, quite often, ate their own > > > > > > > young. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you a latent homosexual, Shemp? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It used to be that you constantly accused me of frequenting female > > > > > prostitutes. > > > > > > > > > > Now, apparently, I'm gay. > > > > > > > > > > Make up your mind, Manning. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Latent and closet homosexuals sometimes compensate with excesses in the > > > > other direction. > > > > > > > > > Oh, I see. > > > > > > Let me see if I've got this right: > > > > > > Your diagnosis of my imagined homosexuality > > > > > > According to that peer-reviewed and published study, the fact that you're a > > such homophobe strongly suggests you could easily be a latent homosexual. > > > > > > > > > is confirmed by your diagnosis of my imagined frequenting of female > > > > prostitutes? > > > > > > Your history of high numbers of posts about sex is on record. And I indeed > > recall you bragging on AMT about your visits with hookers as I debated the > > Arizona laws about it with you at the time. > > [snip] > > > The only one obsessed by my sex life is you, John Manning. > > As for my posts regarding gay marriage: if one has to be automatically > accused of being a homophobe simply because he opposes gay marriage then that > really isn't a good foundation for a rationale debate. >
I'm sure readers can easily decide for themselves if your commentary on in this forum about homosexuality and gay marriage [including posting a link to gay pornography] is homophobic or not.
