> But will you? Are you even ABLE to put into writing the > things that Hillary did wrong *without* blaming them on > someone else? > So, its all about Hillary.
Turq, the election is over, in case you have not been keeping up with the news. You're better at keeping up with how many messages Judy posts - why don't you post the reasons that you think Hillary lost the election? LOL! > I guess we'll see... > This is going to be fun to watch - Turq getting waxed, again. for posting sexist remarks. But nobody will probably even reply to his flame. Now wouldn't that be special? You already lost the debate, Turq, by being forced to waste your last post in order to show that you have a bigger dick than anyone, when in reality, you probably can't even find it, to thrust into anything but your own hand. TurquoiseB wrote: > Having written earlier about TRENDS in people's > posts, here's another I've noticed. Here it is > over a year after Hillary lost her bid for the > Presidential nomination, the Hillary Hanger-On-ers > keep bringing it up, and yet I cannot remember a > single post in which they pointed out a reason for > her losing *that was Hillary's fault*. > > Everything has been in terms of victim mentality. > "Hillary lost because such-and-such was done to her." > "Hillary lost because so-and-so done her wrong." > "Hillary lost because the deck was stacked against > her by such-and-such nefarious people or organization." > > NOT ONCE do I remember the two strident Hillary sup- > porters citing anything that was actually Hillary's > FAULT as a reason for her loss. It was always SOMEONE > ELSE'S FAULT. So here's my challenge: > > Write a post in which you list five things that Hillary > Clinton did wrong or did badly -- so wrong or so badly > that these mistakes or inadequacies cost her the nom- > ination. These five "bullet points" cannot be "back-door > blame" arguments, like "Hillary wasn't tough enough on > all the people using sexism against her," which implies > (again) that losing wasn't really her fault...it was > these *other* people's fault...the ones she wasn't tough > enough on. Nope, these have to be five mistakes or mis- > steps that she herself bears the responsibility for. > > Because -- damnit -- Hillary was running for the biggest > "The Buck Stops Here" office in the world. IF she had > won the nomination and the Presidency, she would not have > been *able* to play the "blame game" and point fingers at > others when criticized. As President, the buck stops with > her. As a candidate for President, and the person in charge > of her campaign, I think that the buck stops equally with > her. > > To her credit, I've seen Hillary be open about and take > responsibility for some of these fuckups on her part. To > her credit, *she* does not whine and play the "blame > game," especially now that the "game" is history, and > forgotten by all except those who don't seem to be able > to play anything *else*. > > This should not be a hard task. I can think of five such > points just off the top of my head. If I needed to Google > to back them up, I can think of five or six articles > written during the primaries by journalists traveling > with Hillary's campaign that wrote eloquently about the > chaos behind the scenes, the ego-battles and histrionics, > the in-fighting, the economic shambles that her campaign > became, and the effect that *her* behind-the-scenes > tendency to rip her campaign members a new asshole when > things were going badly. You Hillary Hanger-On-ers should > equally be able to find such articles, and thus come up > with five points to meet my challenge. > > But will you? Are you even ABLE to put into writing the > things that Hillary did wrong *without* blaming them on > someone else? > > I guess we'll see... >
