"raunchydog" <raunchy...@...> wrote:

> Not one TM critic had the balls to challenge you personally for saying TM had 
> a positive effect on your mother. Why is that, Rick? Fucking cowards that 
> they are, the fundy TM critics are willing to make up shit about someone you 
> posted about and ignore what you posted about your mother. If they had any 
> integrity at all they would challenge your positive claims for TM as well as 
> the claims of the post you shared with us. Let's see them hold YOUR feet to 
> the fire. Ha! Ain't gonna happen. Cowards.

Raunch, I'm not sure I get your point.  Then again I am guilty of not reading 
posts twice for nuance.  But, the positive effect of TM on Rick's Mom has oft 
been discussed.  Why would one want to challenge or discount this first person 
account. We've got plenty of those. Evidently many people know the story of 
this lady who was helped by TM.  It sounded like someone was bringing up *what 
to me* sounded like a remarkable account, with no substantiation.  Don't you 
want substantiation for stories that you read?  

Reply via email to