See Rushes cogent comments on the statue & a n.y. time article in support of such all in Rushes web cite rush is rt. here!
-----Original Message-----
From: authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:31:59 -0000
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Karl Rove/The Puppet and The Puppeteer...'

--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Re Rowe -- the relivant statue  states in part one must be a 
persent or past UNDRE cover CIA employee & or past in the statue is 5 
yrs. She left te under cover work 9 yrs ago & was in administration --
 management there so no violation of the relivant statue even IF 
outed 2 Yrs. ago or since.

It's difficult to make the case that the CIA, which
was the entity that asked the Justice Department to
investigate the leak, was mistaken about the status
of one of its own employee, and that the Justice
Department hasn't yet realized the CIA got it wrong.

It's not impossible that the statute you cite is
not, in fact, the relevant one, however.  John
Dean, among others, has suggested that the relevant
statue is one having to do with espionage (don't
have the details to hand).

But one way or another, it makes no sense to claim
the investigation isn't about a potential crime.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to