Well said Willytex.

--- On Thu, 9/10/09, WillyTex <[email protected]> wrote:


From: WillyTex <[email protected]>
Subject: [FairfieldLife] When does the soul enter the body? ----- Re: Someone 
recommended this
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, September 10, 2009, 1:37 PM


  



> > My personal experience was entering my body some time
> > Before entering the birth canal. The fact remains,
> > nobody knows for sure. So... you want to take a chance?
> >
Judy wrote:
> On what, exactly?
>
Of killing the soul-monad. If you kill the soul-monad, you
thus prevent it from reaching enlightenment, thus you
retard it's evolution. That's assuming that there is a 
soul-monad and that it enters the fetus at conception.

According to the theory of karma, anyone who kills the
soul of another being will reap the karma. Marshy said 
it was a 'sin', which he probably associated with the
theory of karma, implying that such an act would retard
your own spiritual evolution.

> Assuming an abortion takes place after ensoulment, 
what do you think happens to the soul?
> 
The soul-monad gets killed and it goes back to the
Creator, who then must create another soul-monad to take
it's place. 

> What happens to the soul if there's a miscarriage after
> ensoulment?
>
The soul dies a natural death and no karma is accrued.

> You do know that the *vast* majority--over 80 percent--
> of abortions take place prior to 12 weeks' gestation,
> right?
>
Almost all of the people on the planet think that killing
the soul is a bad thing to do, unless they are 
materialists who don't believe in the soul-monad theory. 

In that case, since there is no soul-monad in the first 
place, there would be nothing to kill, there would just 
be an elimination of an unwanted material substance. 

And the materialist would also probably deny the existence 
of karma. So, for the materialist, there would be no need 
to refrain from killing anything at all - it's just a
natural thing to do. A materialist would see no need
to refrain from killing anyone, since the means always
justifies the ends.

















      

Reply via email to