--- In [email protected], Mike Dixon <mdixon.6...@...> wrote:
>
> I as just wondering, did Thomas Friedman write any articles about the film 
> depicting the assasination of W, or was that OK?
> 


~~Barack Obama faces 30 death threats a day, stretching US Secret Service~~

Since Mr Obama took office, the rate of threats against the president has 
increased 400 per cent from the 3,000 a year or so under President George 
W.Bush, according to Ronald Kessler, author of In the President's Secret 
Service.
- http://snipurl.com/s0b45

This has been widely reported.

Since Obama's approval rating is at least 20 points higher than Bush's was for 
most of his second term, why do you think there's such a difference Dixon? Why 
do you think the death threats are 400% higher for Obama?




> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: do.rflex <do.rf...@...>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:53:46 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Vile rhetoric from the Right becoming more and more 
> extreme
> 
>   
> 
> Where Did `We' Go? 
> By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
> Published: September 29, 2009 
> I hate to write about this, but I have actually been to this play before and 
> it is really disturbing. 
> 
> I was in Israel interviewing Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin 
> just before he was assassinated in 1995. We had a beer in 
> his office. He needed one. I remember the ugly mood in Israel 
> then â€" a mood in which extreme right-wing settlers and 
> politicians were doing all they could to delegitimize Rabin, 
> who was committed to trading land for peace as part of the 
> Oslo accords. 
> 
> They questioned his authority. They accused him of treason. 
> They created pictures depicting him as a Nazi SS officer, 
> and they shouted death threats at rallies. His political 
> opponents winked at it all.
> 
> And in so doing they created a poisonous political environment 
> that was interpreted by one right-wing Jewish nationalist as a 
> license to kill Rabin â€" he must have heard, "God will be on 
> your side" â€" and so he did.
> 
> Others have already remarked on this analogy, but I want to add my voice 
> because the parallels to Israel then and America today turn my stomach: I 
> have no problem with any of the substantive criticism of President Obama from 
> the right or left. 
> 
> But something very dangerous is happening. Criticism from the far right has 
> begun tipping over into delegitimation and creating the same kind of climate 
> here that existed in Israel on the eve of the Rabin assassination.
> What kind of madness is it that someone would create a poll on Facebook 
> asking respondents, "Should Obama be killed?" The choices were: "No, Maybe, 
> Yes, and Yes if he cuts my health care." The Secret Service is now 
> investigating. I hope they put the jerk in jail and throw away the key 
> because this is exactly what was being done to Rabin.
> Even if you are not worried that someone might draw from these vitriolic 
> attacks a license to try to hurt the president, you have to be worried about 
> what is happening to American politics more broadly. 
> Our leaders, even the president, can no longer utter the word "we" with a 
> straight face. There is no more "we" in American politics at a time when "we" 
> have these huge problems â€" the deficit, the recession, health care, climate 
> change and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan â€" that "we" can only manage, let 
> alone fix, if there is a collective "we" at work.
> Sometimes I wonder whether George H.W. Bush, president "41," will be 
> remembered as our last "legitimate" president. The right impeached Bill 
> Clinton and hounded him from Day 1 with the bogus Whitewater "scandal." 
> George W. Bush was elected under a cloud because of the Florida voting mess, 
> and his critics on the left never let him forget it. 
> And Mr. Obama is now having his legitimacy attacked by a concerted campaign 
> from the right fringe. They are using everything from smears that he is a 
> closet "socialist" to calling him a "liar" in the middle of a joint session 
> of Congress to fabricating doubts about his birth in America and whether he 
> is even a citizen. And these attacks are not just coming from the fringe. Now 
> they come from Lou Dobbs on CNN and from members of the House of 
> Representatives.
> Again, hack away at the man's policies and even his character all you want. I 
> know politics is a tough business. But if we destroy the legitimacy of 
> another president to lead or to pull the country together for what most 
> Americans want most right now â€" nation-building at home â€" we are in 
> serious trouble. We can't go 24 years without a legitimate president â€" not 
> without being swamped by the problems that we will end up postponing because 
> we can't address them rationally.
> The American political system was, as the saying goes, "designed by geniuses 
> so it could be run by idiots." But a cocktail of political and technological 
> trends have converged in the last decade that are making it possible for the 
> idiots of all political stripes to overwhelm and paralyze the genius of our 
> system.
> Those factors are: the wild excess of money in politics; the gerrymandering 
> of political districts, making them permanently Republican or Democratic and 
> erasing the political middle; a 24/7 cable news cycle that makes all politics 
> a daily battle of tactics that overwhelm strategic thinking; and a 
> blogosphere that at its best enriches our debates, adding new checks on the 
> establishment, and at its worst coarsens our debates to a whole new level, 
> giving a new power to anonymous slanderers to send lies around the world. 
> 
> Finally, on top of it all, we now have a permanent presidential campaign that 
> encourages all partisanship, all the time among our leading politicians.
> I would argue that together these changes add up to a difference of degree 
> that is a difference in kind â€" a different kind of American political scene 
> that makes me wonder whether we can seriously discuss serious issues any 
> longer and make decisions on the basis of the national interest. 
> We can't change this overnight, but what we can change, and must change, is 
> people crossing the line between criticizing the president and tacitly 
> encouraging the unthinkable and the unforgivable. 
> 
> http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 09/30/opinion/ 30friedman. html?_r=1&ref=opinion
>


Reply via email to