--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > <snip> > > You guys seem obsessed or at least pre-occupied with looking for > > (and finding) partisian motives here. > > One would think they'd been reading the Republican > talking points on Rove. > > The funny thing is, I haven't seen that much > "not going to stand for it" talk here. The > vast majority of it has been about the legal > intricacies, which are fascinating in and of > themselves. > > > Maybe some have it. All I can > > say is I find high level 'disclosures' fascinating. Dem or Rep. > > Kennedy's filandeering, Johnson's business deals, Nixon's > > Watergate, Reagan's Iran Contra, Clinton Monicagate, Bush's Downing > > Street Memos and the current Rove situation (not to equate it in > > magnitude with some of the other scandals). > > Gee, right, imagine thinking that a serious > breach of classified information that could > endanger national security was anywhere near > the same magnitude as Clinton's and Kennedy's > zipper problems! I mean, get some perspective, > people.
"not to equate it in magnitude with some of the other scandals" could be interpreted in two ways, Rovegate is larger or smaller than the others. I left my take ambiguous. Mainly becasue we don't know how big a story this is. It could be next to nothing, it could unravel into something huge. I don't know and I don't think anyone does at this point (other that Fitzgerald and the Grand Jury). Though I did hear a justice dept insider say that Fitzgerald has a huge stack of material that has not yet become public. Regardless, I doubt this will have the magnitude of watergate. But lets wait and see and not speculate too far ahead. But as far as zippers, that falls way down my list of issues being of importance, wheher it was Lincoln (gay?), Roosevelt, Kennedy, Johnson (his famous line among the traveling seretarial pool is said to have been, "how would you like to serve your President of the United States?"), Bush I, Clinton, or Jenna and Barbara. Direct lies and coverups are more problematic. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
