--- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > In a message dated 7/14/05 1:54:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > I have seen several recent interviews with Clinton. IMO, the contrast > > to Bush in terms of wit, speaking ability, grasp of concepts, > > intellectual abilities, poltical sense, are day and night. ( I wont > > tell you which is day and which is night :) ) > > > > If you had the choice to vote for Bush as Bush, or a Clinton who was a > > Bush clone ideologically, who would you vote for? Just curious. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmmmmm. cloning presidents, now that would be interesting. I > suppose I would > > have to stick with the original, not the clone. But it is a nice > idea to toy > > with. > > > Reagans wit, Kennedy's way with words, Clinton's intellect, Bush I's > resume, Carters integrity, T Roosevelt's bravado, > > vs > > Nixon's integrity, Bush's intellect, Johnson's honesty, Carter's > bravado, Ford's coordination, Bush I's vision, Reagan's memory, > Eisonhowers work hours,
yikes, Bush II as Bush II still comes out worst! For the top category clone, I would add Johnson's negotiating horse-trading skills To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
