Whoopdeedoo bring it on! I've go a travellin' yurt and camel.

--- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> But of course China could invade Taiwan or do almost anything else
> with impunity by threatening to flood the Treasury bill and other
> markets with their $600 billion of dollar holdings, causing 
Treasuries
> to plunge, substantially raising long-term interest rates, 
doubling or
> tripling mortgage rates over night, severley popping the real 
estate
> bubble, plunging the US into a deep depression (that even SSRIs 
will
> not help.)
> 
> __________________________
> 
> China `ready to use N-weapons against US'
> By Alexandra Harney in Beijing
> 
> China is prepared to use nuclear weapons against the US if it is
> attacked by Washington during a confrontation over Taiwan, 
according
> to a senior Chinese military official.
> 
> 
> "If the Americans draw their missiles and position-guided 
ammunition
> on to the target zone on China's territory, I think we will have to
> respond with nuclear weapons," Zhu Chenghu, a major general in the
> People's Liberation Army, said at an official briefing.
> 
> Mr Zhu, who is also a professor at China's National Defence
> University, was speaking at a function for foreign journalists
> organised, in part, by the Chinese government. He added that 
China's
> definition of its territory includes warships and aircraft.
> 
> "If the Americans are determined to interfere [then] we will be
> determined to respond," Mr Zhu said. "We Chinese will prepare
> ourselves for the destruction of all of the cities east of Xian. Of
> course the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds. . . of
> cities will be destroyed by the Chinese." Mr Zhu is a
> self-acknowledged "hawk" who has warned previously that China could
> strike the US with long-range missiles. But his threat to use 
nuclear
> weapons in a conflict over Taiwan is the most specific by a senior
> Chinese official in nearly a decade.
> 
> Rick Fisher, a former senior US congressional official and an
> authority on the Chinese military, said the specific nature of the
> threat "is a new addition to China's public discourse".
> 
> China's official doctrine has called for no first use of nuclear
> weapons since its first atomic test in 1964. But Mr Zhu is not the
> first Chinese official to refer to the possibility of using such
> weapons first in a conflict over Taiwan.
> 
> Chas Freeman, a former US assistant secretary of defence, said in 
1999
> that a PLA official had told him China could respond in kind to a
> nuclear strike by the US in the event of a conflict with Taiwan.
> 
> "In the end you care more about Los Angeles than you do about 
Taipei,"
> Mr Freeman quoted this official as saying. The official is 
believed to
> have been Xiong Guangkai, now the PLA's deputy chief of general 
staff.
> 
> The rationale for the new threats is unclear. China's Ministry of
> Foreign Affairs could not be reached for comment.
> 
> Mr Zhu, who has risen from the rank of colonel over the past five
> years, insisted he was expressing his personal views, and that they
> did not represent the policy of the Chinese government. Nor was he
> anticipating war between China and the US.
> 
> But he said that, because China did not have the capability to 
fight a
> conventional war against the US, the threat to escalate might be 
the
> only way to stop a war.
> 
> His comments could provide insight into the thinking among some in 
the
> PLA amid growing anxiety in Washington about its capabilities. Last
> month, Donald Rumsfeld, defence secretary, voiced concern about
> China's military build-up.
> 
> Additional reporting by Edward Alden in Washington




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to