--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> , "ShempMcGurk" <shempmcg...@...>
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> , "BillyG" <wgm4u@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> , "PaliGap" <compost1uk@> wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> , "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > "But do these revelations justify the sceptics'
> > > > claims that this is "the final nail in the coffin"
> > > > of global warming theory?(8,9)
> > > >
> > > > Not at all.
> > > >
> > > > They damage the credibility of three or four
> > > > scientists. They raise questions about the integrity
> > > > of one or perhaps two out of several hundred lines of
> > > > evidence. To bury manmade climate change, a far wider
> > > > conspiracy would have to be revealed."
> > > >
> > > > ~~ George Monbiot
> >
> > > Well, yes - except that the "three or four" are very much
> > > key players in what is actually a surprisingly small
> > > field.
> >
> > Indeed, the sanctum sanctorum of the international global warming
cabal, now in jeopardy of loosing their reputations, grants and power!
> >
>
>
> AT THE VERY LEAST what must now happen is that AGW skeptics must get a
chair at the table.>>
Sure, just after you clean up the oceans, air, water supplies, and
soils that are going to poison you or your children.
OffWorld
