Lol, a whole long thread of FFL old-folks posting, without one voice of
reason among them.

OffWorld

--- In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> , Vaj <vajradh...@...> wrote:
>
> http://www.examiner.com/x-20682-Boston-Underground-Examiner%
<http://www.examiner.com/x-20682-Boston-Underground-Examiner%>
> 7Ey2009m11d1-Transcendental-Meditation-in-schools-the-David-Lynch-
> program
>
> ARTICLE
>
> Wikileaks Threat from TMO
>
> Transcendental Meditation in schools, the David Lynch program
>
> November 1, 4:36 PM  Boston Underground ExaminerDouglas Mesner
>
>
> This previously posted article has been updated with appended
> material following a letter received from the General Counsel for
> Maharishi University of Management and the David Lynch Foundation for
> Consciousness Based Education and World Peace, William Goldstein,
> under the subject heading "Retraction of Defamatory Article".  Upon
> reviewing Goldstein's criticisms, the author has decided that there
> are no grounds for labeling this article "defamatory".  An open reply
> to Goldstein's letter follows the article below:
> Expel from your mind the stereotyped image of the robed, bearded
> yogi.  Forget the worn image of the unkempt, hash-headed, lotus-
> seated hippy listening to sitar music in an incense-filled room
> behind a beaded curtain.  This is not the Transcendental Meditation
> [TM] we are talking about.  This is Science!
> “Hundreds of scientific studies have been conducted on the
benefits
> of the Transcendental Meditation program at more than 200 independent
> universities and research institutions worldwide in the past 35
> years,” explains the TM-promoting David Lynch Foundation for
> Consciousness-Based Education and World Peace website.  Among the
> positive side-effects of the TM program, we find: increased focus,
> decreased hostility, reduced anxiety, even a reduction in
> cardiovascular disease among practitioners.
> Surely, with this in mind, no reasonable person would argue against
> teaching the TM method in public schools.
> And this is exactly what the David Lynch Foundation - founded by the
> cult film director of Twin Peaks, Blue Velvet, and Mulholland Drive -
> proposes: implementation of a TM teaching program “in public
and
> private schools and in after-school programs across the U.S. and
> around the world, with thousands of students enjoying its
benefits.”
> This past April, the foundation held a large benefit concert in New
> York - including performances by Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, Ben
> Harper, and Moby - which, according to USA Today, raised an estimated
> $3 million toward funding the TM-in-schools program.
> But, despite the attributed benefits and celebrity endorsements, some
> worry that the teaching of a TM-based program in public schools
> constitutes another breach across the ever-eroding church-state
> dividing line.  Americans United for the Separation of Church and
> State reports, “Slowly but steadily, TM seems to be gaining a
> foothold in public schools across the country. The trend has alarmed
> some advocates of church-state separation, who point out that the
> practice is based in Hinduism and that the federal courts removed it
> from New Jersey public schools on church-state grounds in
1979.”
> In regards to funding being offered by the David Lynch Foundation in
> support of the TM program, “Americans United is urging school
> officials to turn down the money, reminding educators that TM in the
> schools can spark litigation. In 1976, Americans United and other
> groups joined with Roman Catholic and Protestant parents to bring a
> lawsuit against the use of TM in five New Jersey public
> schools.” […] “A federal court struck down the TM
classes in
> October of 1977, a decision that was affirmed by the 3rd U.S. Circuit
> Court of Appeals in February of 1979…Ruling in Malnak v. Yogi,
the
> federal appeals court declared that TM is grounded in Hinduism.
> Students, the court pointed out, were assigned the name of a Hindu
> god to chant, and even went through a type of religious initiation
> ceremony called a puja.”
(http://www.au.org/media/church-and-state/
<http://www.au.org/media/church-and-state/>
> archives/2009/06/levitating-over-the.html)
> Indeed, though the David Lynch Foundation seems keen to express that
> TM is just a technique, with real estate holdings, schools, and
> clinicsâ€"even a town, Vedic City, in Iowaâ€"“worth more
than $3
> billion in the late 1990s,” TM is clearly something more.  Some
go
> so far as describe TM as “a cult that ultimately seeks to strip
> individuals of their ability to think and choose freely.”
> Therapist John Knapp, specializing in providing help to ex-cult
> members and people entangled in “cultic relationships”
left TM
> after 23 years of involvement.  “I married somebody who was not
> involved with the group, and part of my group experience was that I
> was asked to lie about a number of items. And living every day with
> someone and having to lie to them was extremely difficult… It
caused
> what you could call a cognitive dissonance. It really caused a
> bifurcation in my mind. It was really difficult to live with. And
> I’d also gotten very far away from my family, which is not
uncommon
> for people who are in these kinds of [cultic] relationships. As my
> mother was getting older I wanted to re-establish my ties with her
> and the family. These kinds of things led me to begin questioning my
> relationship [with TM].”
>
> Upon deciding that he would leave TM, Knapp reports that he suffered
> a good deal of harassing behavior from the group.  “It was
difficult
> for me, because I had believed so strongly in this group [TM]. My
> spiritual and emotional life was really bound up completely with this
> group, so when they turned on me it was very confusing and very
> difficult for me…”
> Worse, Knapp reports negative effects derived from the meditation
> technique itself, from addictive behavior to increased feelings of
> dissociation.  He claims that many clients of his that come from TM
> have experienced the same.
> TM was founded by a man known as Maharishi Mahesh Yogi in 1956 in
> India, and the revered guru himself had once been accused of using
> “fear and intimidation” in order to work to prevent a
disciple
> from leaving the Maharishi International University in Fairfield,
> Iowa. The disillusioned student, Robert Kropinski, and six other
> people sued Maharishi’s University for $9 million on the
grounds
> of “fraud, neglect, and intentionally inflicting emotional
> damage”. Kropinski stated that none of the promised TM benefits
ever
> surfaced during his time as a student, and he was awarded $138,000 by
> a Washington D.C. jury. Maharishi did not appear in court, as he was
> never available to receive summons.
>
> Admittedly, all of this sounds most unpleasant, but what of the
> scientific data supporting the individual benefits of TM?
> There are problems with TM’s data.  While the David Lynch
Foundation
> endlessly promotes the “unique” benefits of TM, there is
a
> conspicuous shortage of comparative analytical studies that measure
> TM against other relaxation techniques.  Surprisingly, studies
> measuring the effects of a simple mid-day nap report many of the
> same “unique” benefits touted by TM.
>
> In fact, a study published in the journal Science in 1976 found in
> studying “five experienced practitioners of Transcendental
> Meditation”, that they “spent appreciable parts of
meditation
> sessions” merely napping.
>
> And, according to a June 2007 report, sponsored by the U.S.
> Department of Health and Human Services that evaluated the quality of
> the meditation research along an array of standard scientific
> criteria such as the proper use of randomization and control group
> techniques, “Overall, the methodological quality of both
> intervention and observational analytic studies on meditation
> practices is poor.”
> According to Dr. Barry Markovsky, professor of Sociology at the
> University of South Carolina, “Poor evidence, even in large
> quantities, falls short of establishing scientifically the benefits
> of TM.”
>
> Worst of all, TM makes a series of staggering claims that can be
> charitably described as “unlikely”.  Old advertisements
for TM
> claim that practitioners of TM will develop “supernormal
powers”
> including “supernormal sight and hearing”, invisibility,
and
> levitation!  The organization even circulated photos with pictures of
> lotus-seated students apparently hovering above the ground, but first-
> hand observations of the “levitations” left many
unconvinced. The
> levitators never managed to levitate for very long; they never
> really “hovered”. In fact, they sprung up rather
abruptly and
> dropped immediately to the ground again. Really, it was quite
> apparent that these transcendent hopefuls were merely hopping about
> from a seated position.
>
> Nor has TM provided any legitimized demonstrations of any of its
> supernormal powers.
>
> When asked about “advanced techniques” such as
“yogic flight”
> during a press conference promoting his benefit concert, David Lynch
> replied with some rambling vagaries about a “field of
unity”,
> “bliss”, and the “collective
consciousness”.
>
> The David Lynch Foundation has a stated of goal of teaching TM to one
> million children, which is reminiscent of another supernatural claim
> of TM: the Maharishi Effect, which states that a certain critical
> mass of TM meditators can affect change upon the material world.
> While John Hagelin of the David Lynch Foundation claims that the
> Maharishi Effect is a scientifically proven phenomenon, there is no
> reliable evidence to support this.  (Hagelin, it should be noted, is
> partially to blame for the simple-minded buffoonery of the best-
> selling book The Secret, which promotes a simpler version of the
> Maharishi Effect: The idea that one can obtain what one wants through
> mere wishful thinking.)  Hagelin claims that in 1993 crime was
> reduced in Washington, DC during a two month period due to the
> collective effort of 4000 TM practitioners.
>
> As Skeptico reports: “There were many problems with this
experiment.
> One was that the murder rate rose during the period in question.
> Another was that Hagelin’s report stated violent crime had been
> reduced by 18% (in the film [What The Bleep Do We Know] he says 25%),
> but reduced compared with what? How did he know what the crime rate
> would have been without the TM? It was discovered later that all the
> members of the “independent scientific review board”
that
> scrutinized the project were followers of the Maharishi. The study
> was pseudoscience: no double blinding, the reviewers were not
> independent, and the experiment has never been independently
> replicated. Hagelin deservedly won an Ig Nobel Prize in 1994 for this
> outstanding piece of work.”
>
> James Randi, famed stage magician, author, founder of the James Randi
> Educational Foundation, and debunker of supernatural claims, explains
> that TM has “always maintained this… [the idea] that if a
certain
> critical number of people take up TM, they will protect everybody,
> and the world will be perfectly safe from then on.”
>
> Randi came to be aware of TM through his friend and fellow magician,
> Doug Henning. “I knew [Henning] very well as a kid, and later
as a
> mature magician. We were always in touch…” Randi describes a
> deeply cultic relationship between Henning and Transcendental
> Meditation that would destroy Henning’s career and eventually
take
> his life. Henning’s career as a television magician was
compromised
> as he strove to hire only TM initiates to work on the set. According
> to Randi, this was not only problematic for the fact that it was
> difficult to find people within TM who were talented in television
> production, but “every so often they went in to meditation and
work
> just stopped…” Eventually, TV executives grew weary of
Henning’s
> professional antics.
>
> Henning became even more deeply involved with TM following his
> diagnosis of liver cancer, eventually removing himself from contact
> with non-TM practitioners. “He gave up all medical care…
the
> Maharishi had told him that he could recover from his liver cancer
> simply from meditating… he meditated himself to death.”
Henning
> died in February of 2000.
>
> “I’m so angry at the TM movement,” says Randi,
“for having
> taken an innocent person.”
>
> John Knapp feels that the drive to bring TM into more schools is
> destined to failure as any critical scrutiny of the organization will
> prove its undoing.  According to him, “It’s just too
damn
> strange…”
>
> Relaxation â€" whether by crude napping, or practiced meditation
â€"
> holds certain benefits that are not the monopoly of the TM brand.  It
> is this author’s hope that schools will continue to seek
techniques
> to aid the reduction of stress and conflict - while increasing health
> and focus - without reducing their curriculum to supernatural
> philosophies that cross the church-state line.
>
> *******************
>
> On October 13 editors at Examiner received an email from William
> Goldstein, General Counsel for Maharishi University of Management and
> the David Lynch Foundation for Consciousness Based Education and
> World Peace.  The email's subject heading was "Retraction of
> Defamatory Article", and it ended with strong words claiming that the
> "falsehoods, defamations and omissions [in the article above] compel
> me [Goldstein] to ask you to remove this article from your newspaper
> to put an end to the continuing damage its publication causes to my
> client."
>
> And what were these "falsehoods, defamations and omissions"?
> Goldstein opens: "I will not comment on the inappropriate statements
> on the scientific research conducted on the TM program contained in
> Mr. Mesner’s article.  Dr. Orme Johnson’s comments you
have
> received reply more expertly than I could on that subject and I
> incorporate them."
>
> I had read Dr. Orme Johnson's criticisms and found them less than
> compelling, some of them nonsensical.  For instance, this comment -
> "To Knapp’s statement that TM is “too strange”
for America, one
> has to ask, strange for whom, the narrow minded and ethnocentric? I
> think our nation has gotten past a lot of that." - left me to merely
> wonder what in the world ethnocentricism might have to do with any of
> this if TM is not to be viewed as an Eastern practice rooted in
> Eastern beliefs and traditions?
>
> Dr. Orme Johnson made comments suggesting that James Randi was
> incorrect regarding Henning's situation: "Maharishi’s advice
was
> always to seek medical attention when one gets sick, not “just
> meditate” as Randi alleges. Studies of medical care utilization
that
> I conducted on Blue Cross statistics found that 2,000 TM subjects
> over a five-year period had on average 50% less hospitalization and
> doctors visits than the norm or matched controls, with reductions in
> all categories of disease."
>
> This comment would be laughable if the ramifications were less
> grave.  When the criticism is that TM discouraged a sick man from
> seeking medical attention, the statistic of 50% less hospitalization
> amongst TM practitioners hardly makes that claim seem less credible.
> But, just the same, if Randi's comments are "falsehoods, defamations,
> or omissions", that is problem that must be taken up with James
> Randi.  He is accurately quoted in the article above.
>
> Likewise, the claim that TM is a "cult" is attributed, and Goldstein
> must take any disagreement with that label up with those who use it
> to describe his... "client".  In my favorite part of his email,
> Goldstein writes: Mr. Mesner then goes on to paste the horrific label
> of a “cult” on the TM program. Al Gore, Jerry Seinfeld
and Paul
> McCartney would find it remarkable to be told they are members of a
> cult, but that does not mitigate the serious damages that such
> thoughtless labeling can have on the organizations which teach these
> programs to the public. And while Jerry may laugh at such a
> characterization, Al Gore may not have as well developed a sense of
> humor.
>
> This shameless name-dropping is pointless, as it can be worked both
> ways.  "Jerry may laugh", and Al Gore may be a humorless bore.  Or
> Jerry may in fact cringe in disgust if presented with the idea that
> TM practitioners may learn to levitate, or that the Maharishi Effect
> is a proven phenomena.  Al Gore may laugh at such nonsense.  We
> really don't know, do we?  Were Jerry Seinfeld, Al Gore, or Paul
> McCartney asked to give an opinion of my article?  Is it just too
> remarkable to imagine that such celebrities might be involved in a
> "cult" or cult-based practices?  Do Tom Cruise and John Travolta find
> it remarkable that many accuse Scientology of being a cult?  For that
> matter, isn't Scientology's Dianetics "auditing" practice nothing
> more than a therapeutic technique?  As such, perhaps it too should be
> welcomed into school rooms.
>
> Goldstein goes on to question the credibility of John Knapp: "Mr.
> Knapp has developed a niche in the field of counseling for victims of
> cults which he actively promotes on his websites. He has created a
> straw man, and now he is selling expensive medicine to him. "
> While I'm not exactly sure what is meant by this, it seems to imply
> that counseling ex-TM practitioners has proven lucrative for Knapp
> which would also imply a consistent client base of  TM disaffected.
> But, again, if Goldstein takes issue with what is said by Knapp, he
> must take it up with him.  Knapp is accurately quoted in the article
> above.
>
> The one helpful item mentioned in Goldstein's email was the fact that
> the Kropinski finding was over-turned on appeal - though this would
> better have been mentioned in the comments, not in a full letter
> claiming "defamation".
>
> Most other comments regarding this article, by Dr. Orme Johnson and
> others, take exception to the criticisms regarding the Maharishi
> Effect.  I have no intention of being ambiguous about this: the
> Maharishi Effect is not a proven phenomena.  I seriously doubt it can
> even be considered a valid hypothesis.  It's failed hippy mysticism,
> and it has no place whatever in public schools.
>
> I said it.
>
> Go ahead and sue me.
>
> Speaking only for myself,
>
> Douglas Mesner
>


Reply via email to