Well Mike if you love blood and war so much why don't you volunteer to go fight in Afghanistan? Your moral standards are those of a Texas miscreant. Oh that's right, you are a Texas miscreant. :-D
Mike Dixon wrote: > What big government and big military are we at war with? If you meant us, big > government is not defined by how big our military is, but by beauracracy, > regulation and entitlement.So, you do want the Taliban restored in > Afghanistan along with all that it intails. What oil and pipeline in > Afghanistan? I believe there might have been a pipeline proposed at one time, > but it was only *thru* Afghanistan, not *out of* Afghanistan. Yes, war can be > a racket , people can profit from it, but so can Global warming or poverty > be a racket. Bhairitu, your comparison of the *religious right* to the > Taliban is laughable and shows how out of touch you are with reality. If you > had to choose one to live under, American religious right or the Taliban, you > would choose the Taliban? Just what is it about the *religious right* that > you find so objectionable? Certainly you don't hate them more than the > Taliban because of their stance on abortion, since the Taliban would be > against it also. Maybe it's the setting of higher moral standards, like > personal reponsability, that you may not feel comfortable with. > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Bhairitu <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Fri, December 11, 2009 8:31:52 AM > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Who says we can't pull out now? > > > So Mike as a true conservative you like to spend your tax dollars in > foreign countries with big military and big government? Aren't you a > little confused? I thought conservatives were opposed to big government > and over taxation? > > Yes, there are problems in Afghanistan but we're not there to solve > them. We're there for the oil and it's pipeline. You gotta keep up. > Our lard brained energy company types are licking their chops to get a > hold on those resources. > > Likewise we weren't in Vietnam to decide their civil war either. We > were there for THEIR resources. Don't you remember "The Pentagon Papers"? > > Remember, war is a racket. > > There'll be no Sharia Law in the US nor Taliban either. We have our own > version of the Taliban called the "religious right." But unlike the US > other countries will not be sticking their nose into the second civil > war that is about to erupt and last for decades in this country. > > Mike Dixon wrote: > >> Right, only a couple million people died from *re-education* after we left >> Indo-China. If you really want the world to hate America, pull out after >> freeing a people from the Taliban and let the Taliban come back and take >> over...again. No education for women, very little for boys, total repression >> of human rights, executions before thousands in stadiums, burqas for all >> females, the list goes on. I notice criticism for American military but non >> for the Taliban or Al Qaeda. I guess you don't have a problem with them. I >> guess when the military industrial complex becomes cannon fodder, we can >> adopt Sharia law and enjoy Talibanism right here at home! >> >> >> >> >> ____________ _________ _________ __ >> From: Bhairitu <noozg...@sbcglobal. net> >> To: FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com >> Sent: Thu, December 10, 2009 8:47:38 PM >> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Who says we can't pull out now? >> >> >> We did in Vietnam and look what's happened there. We're trading >> partners with them. If we pulled out of Iraq and Afghanistan right now >> I don't think much bad would happen at all. Yeah, it would take a few >> years for them to get things together. It would also take that amount >> of time after we left. Who are we to be playing god in foreign lands >> anyway?. It's their country not ours. And let's put away those >> psychopaths that run the military industrial complex. Or better yet if >> they want to play war, put them on the battle field. They'd make great >> cannon fodder. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > >
