--- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Well, if you look back on the whole exchange, > > > > you'll see that "context" could not have > > > > referred to anything but the original interview. > > > > > > You are such a great case study for cognitive exclusivity, not open > > > to any interpretations of something other than your own. > > > > You're going straight down the Barry road. > > Make sure it ends up where you want to be > > before you go much further. > > More ad homenum attacks. Even after my stipulation to your > superiority in every way so we could discuss the issue. > > Well, as most laws students are taught, when you can't argue the > facts, wave your hands and attack personalities.
It's not about personalities. It's about philosophy. Nice attempt at misdirection, though. That's familiar too. And the facts, just for the record, are very much on my side. > The singular underlying point of all this discussion is whether from > the CNN interview it was "self evident" that Wilson meant his wife > was not clandestine prior to the Novak article and if one could be > certain that was his intent. You've got it precisely backward. The issue is whether it was self-evident that Wilson did *not* mean his wife was not clandestine prior to the Novak article. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
