--- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Has anybody done any DNA studies?  Something sticks
> > in my mind having to do with DNA and Native Americans,
> > but I can't remember what.
> >
> > Wait.  Tibetans??  How would they have acquired the
> > necessary sailing skills?  Did they have a 
> > tradition of exploration?  Would they have been
> > monkish types, or merchant types?
> 
> Not sure how many DNA studies have  been done; below is an 
> interesting (if lengthy) overview on the subject as a whole (though 
> I see no mention of Tibet here). As to the Tibetan links with the 
> Navajo and Apache, I am unable ATM to find the densely-argued 
> internet papers mentioned earlier. It would appear at least some of 
> them were priestly types, given the numerous correspondences in 
> cosmology and sand painting, as well as sacred dances, costumes, 
> and so on. Again, don't know about DNA, but physical similarities 
> are stunning. Some scholars agree there are definite links between 
> Sino-Tibetan and Athabascan (Navajo-Apache) languages; others 
> remain skeptical.

Any idea why the Tibetans would have been into
long journeys like that?  Some flavors of monks
do so in hope of finding new opportunities to
proselytize, but I shouldn't think that would be
the motivation of Tibetan monks, or would it?

>  http://www.palden.co.uk/hhn/essays/hhn-25.html 
>  Essays on geopolitics
> history and the future
>  Palden Jenkins
> 25. The Columbus myth 

Many thanks.  Fascinating article.

A few comments:

<snip>
> teacher. The teacher sent it to the British Museum for 
> identification, and the reply returned that it was at least 5,000 
> years old and derived from specific rock deposits in Minnesota.

Man, that's a mind-boggler!  Muslim coins in
Massachusetts, e.g., is startling enough, but
to find it going the other way...  Wow.

<snip>
> 56 days by dugout canoe. There are also carvings at La Venta and 
> Monte Alban in Mexico and Guatemala which show bearded Caucasian-
> type people.

I helped edit a book not long ago claiming these
types of carvings were of Atlantean refugees.  But
Atlantis is a whole 'nother can of worms.  On the
other hand, that all these other apparently unlikely
groups visited America tends to make one think there's
all *kinds* of stuff we don't know about along those
lines.

> Chinese visiting America in more recent times have reported the 
> ability to communicate with Sioux, Apache, Bolivian Quecha and some 
> Peruvian peoples.

That's *another* mind-blower.  Boy, I'd like
to hear more about how this transpired.  Similar
words is one thing, but actual *communication*
is amazing.

> Welsh remains have been identified in Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee 
> and Missouri. Welsh-speaking natives were noted by early settlers 
> in New Jersey and the Carolinas

Welsh-speaking *Indians*??

<snip>
> Since the prevailing ideology is that Columbus `discovered' 
> America, and since this ideology is important 
> to the notion of white Anglo-Saxon Protestant supremacy in USA

(But Columbus was Catholic, no?)

<snip>
> These were historically very important choices. The story of the 
> Americas would have been very different if the white settlers and 
> conquistadors had instead elected to fraternise, trade and
> cooperate with the indigenous Americans.

Sounds like superb material for an alternative-
history novel set in the present, based on the
cooperation choice back then.

> However, if native peoples 
> were to be fully recognised for their rights and prerogatives, and 
> if an adjustment were made on a fair and accommodating basis, a 
> massive redistribution of land and resources would have to take 
> place, undermining the very basis on which modern American life 
> stands.

Instead it's being undermined in other ways because
one of the few ways Native American tribes can make
any money is to run casinos for and sell tax-free
cigarettes to white folks.

All very thought-provoking, Rory; thanks again.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to