BTW, Judy, when you provide us with this list of the scenes that match your descriptions of Mary McDonnell's hair below, know that I have my own digital copy of the film and will post screenshots of each of the scenes you point us to, so that everyone can see whether your description of how her hair looks in that scene matches theirs.
Remember, you're looking for: 1. "slovenly looking" 2. "wild and savage" 3. "matted and tangled" 4. "a snarled, dirty-looking mess" 5. "looks like a rat's nest" 6. "looking like a slattern" Have a nice intellectually-honest day. :-) --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > I've really barely scratched the surface of > > the yucks to be found in this extended temper > > tantrum of Barry's. I think I'm going to collect > > the whole shootin' match and upload it to the > > Files section, with expanded commentary, so I > > can refer readers to it whenever Barry > > pontificates about ego-drama and attachment and > > holding grudges and so on. > > Please do, Judy. > > And *when* you do, please do one little thing to > support your side of this whole silliness. It's > easy, and an "intellectually honest" person would > *jump* at the chance to do it and "prove herself > right." > > Just rent a copy of "Dance With Wolves" and watch > it and document for us (with a time listing of when > they appear in the film, or a clear description > of the scene in which they appear) every instance > you see in the film that supports YOUR descriptions > of Mary McConnell's hair as follows: > > 1. "slovenly looking" > 2. "wild and savage" > 3. "matted and tangled" > 4. "a snarled, dirty-looking mess" > 5. "looks like a rat's nest" > 6. "looking like a slattern" > > I ask this because if you really WANT to defend > a dumb idea that is *completely based on these > assertions*, you should be able to prove that > the assertions themselves are correct, and that > these images actually appear in the film. > > If you're so certain that they're correct, just > document them for us. It should be a snap for > someone as detail-oriented and committed to > "intellectual honesty" as yourself. > > If you DON'T do this, doncha think that everyone > has the right to believe you think it's OK to > spend several hours compiling and "annotating" > your set of posts for the FFL Files area to > demonize the person who said your idea was dumb, > but are unwilling to spend two hours proving > that it *wasn't* dumb, and that all the things > you BASE the dumb idea on were really in the > movie? That won't make you look very "intellec- > tually honest," will it? > > Your move. > > Don't forget to comb your hair before going to > the video store. > > See how it feels to be stalked over a nitpick? :-) >
