--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltabl...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > Snip > > > > It is neither yours nor Barry's best work here IMO. > > > > Says Curtis, judging the quality of our work. > > Yup, imagine that. > > > > > And as noted, you judge the exchanges on a lot of > > other things you couldn't possibly evaluate if you > > hadn't been following them. > > Obviously I followed it enough to form the opinion. I haven't slavishly > followed every detail, I don't need to. Your deal with each other is nothing > if not predictable. > > snip > > > > I would not have a malicious liar for a friend, and I > > don't have much respect for anyone who would. > > Right, I got that, but you sure hide it well. The friend of my enemy is my > enemy, works great in the Mid East too. > > Snip > > > Curtis, as you well know, this goes way back with you > > and me, to shortly after you joined us here. > > That's quite a long term grudge you are nursing there Judy. Not a big > respect builder for me, so I guess we have reached some symmetry here. > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > > Again, you are not in a position to comment if you > > > > > > haven't been reading our exchanges attentively. > > > > > > Your thoughts on the nature of those exchanges do not > > > > > > carry any weight with me. > > > > > > > > > > I was so hoping you were hanging on my every word. But > > > > > there is zero chance that I will begin reading your > > > > > exchanges "attentively." Seriously Judy why would I > > > > > want to do that? Your angle is only fascinating to you. > > > > > You shouldn't judge the rest of us harshly for not > > > > > giving a shit. > > > > > > > > Obviously, that isn't what I'm saying. It's fine if you > > > > don't read them, but if you don't, you shouldn't be > > > > judging them. Like I said, simple. > > > > > > I judge them boring. > > > > You do a lot more than that. > > > > > I don't need to read them all to know that. > > > > An episode of a long-running TV series can be boring > > when you just tune into an episode now and then, > > because there's no continuity or context, and you > > can't connect with what's going on. > > > > > It is neither yours nor Barry's best work here IMO. > > > > Says Curtis, judging the quality of our work. > > > > And as noted, you judge the exchanges on a lot of > > other things you couldn't possibly evaluate if you > > hadn't been following them. > > > > > > > "Acknowledging more fault" sound like a real party. > > > > > I'm gunna take a pass on this little game. > > > > > > > > Yeah, well, that's part of what I was saying about our > > > > respective ethical principles. That and thinking it's > > > > cute when your buddy tells malicious lies, > > > > > > WTF? I never said anything like this. I said I put them > > > in the folder titled "fucking with Judy" and don't take > > > them seriously the way you do. > > > > Close enough. And it isn't just me Barry tells malicious > > lies about. It's his M.O. *He* means them to be taken > > seriously, no matter what he claims here or what he may > > tell you on the side. > > > > Again, the exchange about the Haiti Global Good News > > site is paradigmatic: Barry gets caught in a malicious > > lie (not about me), and in trying to wiggle out of it > > tells more lies (including about me). The whole thing > > is dead serious. > > > > I would not have a malicious liar for a friend, and I > > don't have much respect for anyone who would. > > > > > and not > > > > being willing to stand up for people who have been > > > > wrongly accused, among other things. > > > > > > Judy I have stood up for you plenty of times here > > > > Curtis, as you well know, this goes way back with you > > and me, to shortly after you joined us here. > > > > > arguing for the value I find in our exchanges. > > > > Not the same thing. > > > > > > > > > > > Often to people who I consider friends here like Geezer. I just don't > > > care about your Barry deal. I believe you over value these exchanges as > > > important. But they are for you so go for it. But judging me for not > > > caring is a bit self centered at the least. I choose my own online > > > relationship with each person here on my own terms and with my own > > > valuation. I do my best to ignore how people here interact when > > > considering the value of my own communication here. I try to avoid > > > taking on any filters people offer me about people here. Sometimes I am > > > successful. > > > Curtis my man, you have the patience of a saint in your attempt to explain to Judy why the Judy/Barry thing is of interest to basically no one except Judy and (sometimes) Barry. The Judy/Barry thing is the main reason I bailed on reading FFL for months on end. Your return (along with the admittedly juicy King Tony and kids sit-com story) has kept me looking in with growing interest.
Doing any recording?
