In a message dated 7/17/05 4:18:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would appear you are denying that the feds had the rights any
other individual would have -- to retain what was legally sold to
them. By any legal standpoint I can see, the feds were perfectly
justified in retaining their lawfully purchased property. Suddenly
saying you don't like your neighbor and you want the property back
you sold them, and shooting at them if they fail to comply, is not a
legal recourse, is it?

Show me a precedence in which a country declaring it's independence from another, buys back it's own territory.


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to