--- In [email protected], tartbrain <no_re...@...> wrote:
> Of course. In re reading this I see how it could have been seen as snide or > snarky. Not at all the intention. I was simply repeating what I thought you > meant. I wondered if you meant to include the "on" but in the haste of > posting, left it out. I was riffing off the quote. Thanks for clarifying. > > Rereading my posts I see so many typos and missing words. Putting the huge > flow of the mind rapidly onto 2 dimensional paper is always a bit of a mis > fit. And doing so rapidly, and in a sense rawly -- without a lot of editing > -- can create some jerky prose. (for example I wrote "coal mind" when I meant > "coal mine" but the latter sort of hits the spot better, though tenuously so. I totally dug your writing. It is true that intentions can be tricky online. But this opportunity to write and react has a real value to me and I appreciate when someone ups the ante on the ideas. > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], tartbrain <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > I really enjoyed your thoughtful post. Your description of Jerry's role in > > our lives was right on. > > > > I can't think of any area when my thinking was better when I was younger. > > I believe I have improved since yesterday. I got a through experience of > > Jerry off mike. He is not a guy who enjoyes debate, even with believers > > let alone someone who wants to challenge him. He has been in a position of > > privileged deference for waaay too long. He is very guarded. > > > > ME;> > I moved. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tart:> Most of us moved on. > > > > > > > This distinction caught me by surprise. I'm not sure what you are implying > > here. We are conversing on a board with a focus on TM and our history with > > it. I have "moved on" in all sorts of ways and that was what I meant by > > saying I moved. That doesn't detract from my interest in reevaluating my > > feelings about my spirituality and using this chance to practice my writing > > here. I didn't find your reflections any more moving onish than my own. We > > are all just talk'n here right? > > Of course. In re reading this I see how it could have been seen as snide or > snarky. Not at all the intention. I was simply repeating what I thought you > meant. I wondered if you meant to include the "on" but in the haste of > posting, left it out. > > Rereading my posts I see so many typos and missing words. Putting the huge > flow of the mind rapidly onto 2 dimensional paper is always a bit of a mis > fit. And doing so rapidly, and in a sense rawly -- without a lot of editing > -- can create some jerky prose. (for example I wrote "coal mind" when I meant > "coal mine" but the latter sort of hits the spot better, though tenuously so. >
