--- In [email protected], tartbrain <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "lurkernomore20002000" <steve.sundur@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], tartbrain <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > One thing that strikes me is the undercurrent is > > > some posts that if Jerry is back, he will lead a > > > new renaissance of the glory days of the movement. > > > > What!? Where are you getting that? > > Maybe its a mis-perception. And its more a theme I have > seen in other discussions and sets of posts. Along the > lines of "if the TMO would just get back to only teaching > TM for $35, none of the other crap, all would be all so > groovy again." > > And Jerry has in the past been mentioned in hopeful tones > to arise like a pheonix to lead the charge. Windmills be > on red alert.
Dunno about a "new renaissance of the glory days of the movement," but it does seem that the movement is in the process of changing since MMY died. Bringing Jerry back looks to me like an attempt by the movement to restore some of its legitimacy in the eyes of the old-timers. I wouldn't expect Jerry to become the new leader, but it wouldn't surprise me if he were asked to give his advice on how to bind up some of the holes the movement has shot in its feet.
