--- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_re...@...> wrote:
> The goal was to lend a hand to the cosmic purpose of ending capitalism on > this particular planet. Maharishi, the Master of Masters in this Age, with > His onepointed focus, simply did just that. The growth of the movement was an example of his taking advantage of our free market regulation balance. He was able to start up a business and then not pay taxes because of the designation educational. In my view we need to be able to tax religions and spiritual groups like everyone else. The movement's non profit educational organization status seems dubious to me but they pulled it off. But Maharishi for all his posturing was a big fan and beneficiary of capitalism. He was just not a fan of freedom for others. > > > > --- In [email protected], "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > noun > > > 1.a theory or system of social organization that advocates the >vesting > > > of the ownership and control of the means of production and > > > >distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole. > > > > > > In the post-MMY era, is the movement re-setting to become more socialistic? > > > > Look at the SBS Trust and Global Country now: > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0Qu7a2lbkw > > > > or > > MUM as community. > > > > The old ownership form of the movement was to extract capital from the > > means of production and the community as a whole and transfer that to the > > East. > > > The goal was to lend a hand to the cosmic purpose of ending capitalism on > this particular planet. Maharishi, the Master of Masters in this Age, with > His onepointed focus, simply did just that. >
